Der Nervenarzt · 2019
[Orofacial dysfunction and posttraumatic stress disorder : A context analysis of soldiers after military deployment].
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Braas R, Eger T, Gohr J, Wörner F, Wolowski A
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: In studies on posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD, ICD 10: F43.1) and in clinical observation, the high proportion of soldiers with painful craniomandibular dysfunction (CMD) is conspicuous.
AIM: This study aimed to clarify if there is a connection between orofacial dysfunction, pain in this region, stress and PTSD.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 36 inpatients (PTSD group) with specialist psychiatrically confirmed PTSD after up to 17 foreign deployments and 36 control subjects with 2-40 foreign deployments underwent a functional dental examination. All participants filled out a form for the gradation of chronic pain (GCP, degrees 0-4) as well as the depression, fear and stress scale (DFSS).
RESULTS: Soldiers with PTSD had significantly worse orofacial functional diagnoses and higher pain scores, although on average they had less combat deployments (PTSD: maximum mouth opening 31.4 ± 8.0 mm vs. 57 ± 6 mm, GCP 3.5 ± 1.0 vs. 0.5 ± 0.5).The PTSD group showed a depression score of 14.9 ± 4.2 vs. the control group 1.4 ± 2.1, a fear score of 13.7 ± 3.9 vs. 1.0 ± 1.5 and a stress score of 16.1 ± 3.4 vs. 3.3 ± 2.9.
CONCLUSION: The data from this pilot study show an obvious connection between PTSD and orofacial dysfunctions. Through further prospective studies it should be evaluated if there is a general vulnerability of those afflicted for pathological orofacial stress. This could be used for screening before combat deployment.
AIM: This study aimed to clarify if there is a connection between orofacial dysfunction, pain in this region, stress and PTSD.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 36 inpatients (PTSD group) with specialist psychiatrically confirmed PTSD after up to 17 foreign deployments and 36 control subjects with 2-40 foreign deployments underwent a functional dental examination. All participants filled out a form for the gradation of chronic pain (GCP, degrees 0-4) as well as the depression, fear and stress scale (DFSS).
RESULTS: Soldiers with PTSD had significantly worse orofacial functional diagnoses and higher pain scores, although on average they had less combat deployments (PTSD: maximum mouth opening 31.4 ± 8.0 mm vs. 57 ± 6 mm, GCP 3.5 ± 1.0 vs. 0.5 ± 0.5).The PTSD group showed a depression score of 14.9 ± 4.2 vs. the control group 1.4 ± 2.1, a fear score of 13.7 ± 3.9 vs. 1.0 ± 1.5 and a stress score of 16.1 ± 3.4 vs. 3.3 ± 2.9.
CONCLUSION: The data from this pilot study show an obvious connection between PTSD and orofacial dysfunctions. Through further prospective studies it should be evaluated if there is a general vulnerability of those afflicted for pathological orofacial stress. This could be used for screening before combat deployment.