MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1038/sc.2010.162

Медицинская библиотека · Spinal cord · 2010

Do gastrointestinal transit times and colonic dimensions change with time since spinal cord injury?

Faaborg P M, Christensen P, Rosenkilde M, Laurberg S, Krogh K

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

STUDY

DESIGN

Long-term follow-up study.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether gastrointestinal transit times (GITTs) and colonic dimensions change during the first or subsequent decades after spinal cord injury (SCI).

SETTING

Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.

METHODS

GITT and colonic dimensions were evaluated by means of radio-opaque markers. Group A (n=12) was investigated 1 year after SCI and again 13 (range 11-14) years later. Group B (n=10) was studied 19 (range 9-36) years after injury and again 12 (range 11-12) years later. All had been treated with conservative bowel management.

RESULTS

In group A, the median GITT 1 year after injury was 4.3 (range 1.1-6.5) days and 13 years later, it was 3.2 (range 1.3-6.5) days, P=0.96. In group B, the median GITT 19 year after injury was 3.4 (range 0.6-5.9) days and 12 years later, it was 3.2 (range 1.9-5.5) days, P=0.77. None of the two groups experienced a significant change in the diameter of the caecum/ascending colon, transverse colon, descending colon or the sigmoid during long-term follow-up. Megacolon was present in four patients at baseline and in five at follow-up.

CONCLUSION

GITTs and colonic dimensions did not change, neither during the first decade nor long after SCI.

Для цитирования: Faaborg P M, Christensen P, Rosenkilde M, Laurberg S, Krogh K. Do gastrointestinal transit times and colonic dimensions change with time since spinal cord injury?. Spinal cord. 2010. DOI: 10.1038/sc.2010.162.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.