MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/cin.0000000000001380

Медицинская библиотека · Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN · 2026

Evaluating the Content, Quality, and Reliability of Migraine-related Videos on TikTok in China: Opportunities and Challenges for Health Information Dissemination.

Guo Yanli, Ma Ziyi, Xue Jingyuan, Zhou Xiaowei, Wang Ling, Dong Ci

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

This descriptive cross-sectional study investigated the content, quality, and reliability of migraine-related videos on TikTok. The top 200 migraine-related TikTok videos (176 eligible) were analyzed to assess content quality and reliability using Goobie's 6 questions and the DISCERN questionnaire. Although 98.8% (174/176) of the videos were physician-uploaded, 58.5% lacked disease definitions, and 34.7% omitted outcomes. While physician-uploaded videos had higher DISCERN scores, 36.93% still received a "poor" rating, and no correlation was found between video quality and engagement metrics (likes, shares) or duration. Despite TikTok's potential for health education, migraine-related content remains inconsistent and biased, highlighting the need for improved, evidence-based public health messaging on social media platforms. This study investigates the quality and reliability of migraine-related TikTok videos and identifies the issues, aiming to promote the improvement of migraine science video quality in the future.

Для цитирования: Guo Yanli, Ma Ziyi, Xue Jingyuan, Zhou Xiaowei, Wang Ling, Dong Ci. Evaluating the Content, Quality, and Reliability of Migraine-related Videos on TikTok in China: Opportunities and Challenges for Health Information Dissemination.. Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN. 2026. DOI: 10.1097/cin.0000000000001380.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.