MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/scs.0000000000008913

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of craniofacial surgery · 2022

A Modified Technique for Harvesting Scapular Tip Flap and to Allow 2 Teams to Work at the Same Time.

Cariati Paolo, Arroyo Rodriguez Susana, Ferrari Silvano

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

AIM: The main aim of the present report is to describe a modified technique of tip scapular flap harvesting to allow 2 surgical teams to work at the same time and to shorten surgical times.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

The medical records of 25 patients that had undergone maxillary or mandibular reconstruction by using a free scapular tip flap were retrospectively reviewed to identify the possible advantages and disadvantages of this type of flap.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients analyzed in this series underwent maxillary reconstruction with tip scapular flap, while the other 12 patients underwent mandibular reconstruction. No failures, partial failures, or infections were evidenced in this series. Scapular tip flap allowed for acceptable esthetic and functional outcomes. In all cases, the patient was placed supine. No major complications were observed at the donor site during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Scapular tip flap might be extremely useful for head and neck reconstruction. Pedicle length, versatility, and reliability represent the major advantages of this reconstructive recourse. Moreover, the resistance of the scapular vascular system to atherosclerosis could be helpful in patients showing contraindications to free fibula flaps.

Для цитирования: Cariati Paolo, Arroyo Rodriguez Susana, Ferrari Silvano. A Modified Technique for Harvesting Scapular Tip Flap and to Allow 2 Teams to Work at the Same Time.. The Journal of craniofacial surgery. 2022. DOI: 10.1097/scs.0000000000008913.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.