MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/00005537-200011000-00006

Медицинская библиотека · The Laryngoscope · 2000

Incidence of carcinoma in incidental tonsil asymmetry.

Syms M J, Birkmire-Peters D P, Holtel M R

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To determine the incidence of malignancy in patients with incidentally discovered unilateral tonsillar enlargement with an otherwise normal physical examination.

STUDY

DESIGN

A retrospective review of our institution's experience with unilateral tonsillar enlargement.

RESULTS

During a five-year period, 570 patients underwent tonsillectomy at our institution. Of patients undergoing tonsillectomy, 49 patients (8.6%) underwent tonsillectomy with normal mucosa, no lymphadenopathy, and asymmetry of the tonsils. Two (4.8%) of the 49 patients with unilateral enlargement had the presence of malignancy. The two adult patients had B-cell lymphoma. Of all of the patients undergoing tonsillectomy, 0.35% had occult malignancy. In additional, the ability of the clinically assessed size (1+, 2+, 3+, and 4+) to predict volume was evaluated. The clinically assessed size and pathologically measured volume were significantly correlated (R = 0.333, P < .013). In 60.5% of the patients, the clinically assessed size and the pathologically measured volume agreed with the asymmetry reported on physical examination.

CONCLUSION

A relatively high number of tonsillectomies will be performed to yield an approximately 5% positive rate of malignancy within removed tonsils that are asymmetrical with normal mucosa and no cervical adenopathy.

Для цитирования: Syms M J, Birkmire-Peters D P, Holtel M R. Incidence of carcinoma in incidental tonsil asymmetry.. The Laryngoscope. 2000. DOI: 10.1097/00005537-200011000-00006.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.