DOI 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00176.x
von Willebrand disease in women with menorrhagia: a systematic review.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To determine the prevalence of von Willebrand disease in women presenting with menorrhagia.
DESIGN
Systematic review of studies evaluating the prevalence of von Willebrand disease in women with menorrhagia.
SETTING
Hospital outpatient clinics (mainly gynaecological) and population surveys.
POPULATION: Women presenting with menorrhagia.
METHODS
Relevant studies were extracted from MEDLINE search, bibliographies of identified articles and published proceedings of meetings and conferences.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of women with von Willebrand disease.
RESULTS
Eleven studies were included, totalling 988 women with menorrhagia. One hundred and thirty-one women were diagnosed to have von Willebrand disease with prevalences in individual studies ranging from 5% to 24%. The overall prevalence was 13% (95% CI 11-15.6%). The prevalence was higher in the European studies-18% (95% CI 15-23%) compared with that in North American studies-10% (95% CI 7.5-13%). This difference (P= 0.007) is likely to be the result of differences in the studies, which include method of recruitment of study population, method of assessing menstrual blood loss ethnic composition of study population, criteria for diagnosis and use of race- and ABO blood group-specific values for von Willebrand factor.
CONCLUSIONS
The prevalence of von Willebrand disease is increased in women with menorrhagia and is the underlying cause in a small but significant group of women with menorrhagia across the world. Testing for this disorder should be considered when investigating women with menorrhagia, especially those of Caucasian origin, those with no obvious pelvic pathology or with additional bleeding symptoms.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.