MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1586/17476348.2013.824690

Медицинская библиотека · Expert review of cardiovascular therapy · 2013

Analysis of extracted cardiac device leads for bacteria type: clinical impact.

Golzio Pier Giorgio, D'Ascenzo Fabrizio, Perversi Jacopo, Gaita Fiorenzo

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

The use of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) increased over time, followed by rise of CIED-related complications, mainly infections and malfunctions. A clear diagnosis of CIED infection is of pivotal importance. When infection is confirmed, transvenous lead extraction (TLE) becomes mandatory, with associated risks and mortality. Local lesions at the device pocket often return negative swabs and tissue specimens, but conservative interventions are inconclusive, raising risks of systemic dissemination of infection and difficulties of subsequent TLE any more. When local bacteriological analyses are positive, once again, a contamination effect cannot be excluded. So traditional local swabs and tissue specimens exhibit low sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of CIED infection. On the contrary, in cases sepsis, blood samples show high specificity, while the sensibility remains low, due to possible negative results in patients on antibiotics. In this scenario, the analysis of extracted device leads seems more appropriate for diagnostic purposes.

Для цитирования: Golzio Pier Giorgio, D'Ascenzo Fabrizio, Perversi Jacopo, Gaita Fiorenzo. Analysis of extracted cardiac device leads for bacteria type: clinical impact.. Expert review of cardiovascular therapy. 2013. DOI: 10.1586/17476348.2013.824690.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.