Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2008
Comparison of bioabsorbable materials for use in artificial tracheal grafts.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tsukada Hisashi, Matsuda Shojiro, Inoue Hajime, Ikada Yoshito, Osada Hiroaki
Аннотация
Limited information exists regarding the usefulness of bioabsorbable materials in the design of tracheal grafts. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of three bioabsorbable materials for use as artificial trachea. Three sets of grafts were prepared: Group 1 (n=6), knitted polyglactin 910 mesh; Group 2 (n=3), copolymer of L-lactide and epsilon-caprolactone sponge reinforced with polyglycoride fibers; and Group 3 (n=8), copolymer of L-lactide and epsilon-caprolactone sponge covered with knitted poly-L-lactide mesh. All grafts were internally reinforced with a titanium stent. A 10-cartilage-ring-length of canine mediastinal trachea was resected and replaced by a bioabsorbable prosthesis with the aid of an omental flap. In Groups 1 and 2, the patency rates decreased below 50% within two months after surgery. In Group 3, six of eight dogs maintained patency rates above 50% from 10 months to 2 years after surgery. Grafts prepared with a copolymer of L-lactide and epsilon-caprolactone sponge covered with knitted poly-l-lactide mesh (Group 3) can function for up to two years after surgery. These results provide evidence toward the feasibility of utilizing bioabsorbable materials as a tracheal prosthesis.