MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00113-003-0688-4

Медицинская библиотека · Der Unfallchirurg · 2003

[Navigated osteosynthesis of the proximal femur. An experimental study].

Hüfner T, Kfuri M, Kendoff D, Richter M, Geerling J, Krettek C

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Screw position in femoral head has been considered the most important predictive factor for mechanical failure in pertrochanteric osteosynthesis, and correct positioning is assisted by fluoroscopic control. Although fluoroscopy leads to precise and reproducible results, it is associated with scattered radiation to the patient and surgical staff. Computer-assisted surgery (CAS) may be an alternative in means of achieving precise screw insertion with a low radiation dose. We designed a laboratory study in which artificial proximal femora were submitted to insertions of a dynamic hip screw (DHS) and an anti-rotational screw (ARS). Three set-ups were tested: (1) conventional implantation with two simultaneous C-arms using a guide wire; (2) drilling and implantation controlled by CAS solely with a 3.2-mm drill bit, then insertion of a guide wire and drilling for the dynamic hip screw; (3) after navigated drilling (3.2 mm) a fluoroscopic control was performed. Five variables were used comparing methods and surgeons: operation time, radiation time, tip-apex distance (TAD), and the insertion neck-shaft angles of DHS and ARS. Considering TAD as a precision parameter, CAS led to screw insertion as accurate as with fluoroscopic control, with a reduction of radiation time up to 93%.

Для цитирования: Hüfner T, Kfuri M, Kendoff D, Richter M, Geerling J, Krettek C. [Navigated osteosynthesis of the proximal femur. An experimental study].. Der Unfallchirurg. 2003. DOI: 10.1007/s00113-003-0688-4.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.