[Clinical study of awake prone positioning treatment in patients with common coronavirus disease 2019 caused by Omicron variant].

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical effect of awake prone positioning (APP) for common coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by Omicron variant.

METHODS

Retrospectively analyze the clinical data of patients with COVID-19 caused by Omicron variant admitted by medical team of Tianjin Third Central Hospital during the period of supporting Tianjin COVID-19 designated hospital from January 8 to February 20, 2022. Patients who met the diagnostic criteria for common COVID-19 and had risk factors for developing severe disease or had pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2) ≤ 0.93 after exercise without supplementary oxygen were enrolled. Patients were divided into APP group and control group according to whether they completed the daily 12-hours APP in the first three days after enrollment. Demographic characteristics, clinical symptoms, COVID-19 vaccination status, laboratory examination, disease progression (progression to severe), time to nucleic acid negative conversion, length of hospital stay, and adverse reactions and tolerability [visual analog scale (VAS) score (the higher the score, the worse the tolerability] during APP were evaluated in two groups. Interleukin-6 (IL-6), C-reactive protein (CRP), SpO2/inhaled oxygen concentration (FiO2) ratio and ROX index (ROXI) were compared between two groups at enrollment, 3rd and 7th day after enrollment.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics, clinical symptoms, vaccination rates of COVID-19 and laboratory tests between the two groups. There were no statistically significant differences in IL-6, CRP, SpO2/FiO2 ratio and ROXI between two groups at the time of enrollment. Compared with the group at the time of enrollment, SpO2/FiO2 ratio and ROXI in APP group increased significantly at the 3rd day after enrollment [SpO2/FiO2 ratio: 461.90 (457.10, 466.70) vs. 446.67 (437.14, 457.10), ROXI: 25.40 (23.33, 25.93) vs. 22.57 (21.86, 24.40), all P < 0.05], and the levels of IL-6 and CRP in control group were significantly increased [IL-6 (ng/L): 18.30 (6.50, 37.75) vs. 7.40 (5.10, 11.15), CRP (mg/L): 11.46 (2.11, 17.96) vs. 4.11 (1.72, 9.05), all P < 0.05]. At the 3rd day of enrollment, the levels of IL-6 and CRP in APP group were significantly lower than those in control group [IL-6 (ng/L): 7.35 (4.35, 12.80) vs. 18.30 (6.50, 37.75), CRP (mg/L): 4.52 (1.98, 9.66) vs. 11.46 (2.11, 17.96), all P < 0.05], while SpO2/FiO2 ratio and ROXI were significantly higher than those in control group [SpO2/FiO2 ratio: 461.90 (457.10, 466.70) vs. 446.67 (441.90, 459.52), ROXI: 25.40 (23.33, 25.93) vs. 23.31 (22.10, 24.66), all P < 0.05]. At the 7th day of enrollment,there were no significant differences in IL-6, CRP, SpO2/FiO2 ratio and ROXI between two groups. There were no severe cases in both groups. The time of nucleic acid negative conversion and length of hospital stay in APP group were significantly shorter than those in control group [10.0 (8.0, 12.0) days vs. 11.0 (9.0, 13.0) days, 12.0 (10.0, 14.0) days vs. 14.0 (12.0,16.0) days, respectively, all P < 0.05]. The main adverse reaction during APP was back pain, and the incidence in APP group was slightly lower than that in control group, but the difference was not statistically significant [17.9% (17/95) vs. 26.5% (27/102), P = 0.149]. VAS score in control group was significantly higher than that in APP group [score: 2.5 (2.0, 4.0) vs. 2.0 (1.0, 3.0), P = 0.004].

CONCLUSIONS

In common COVID-19 patients caused by Omicron variant with high risk factors for progression to severe disease or decreased oxygen reserve capacity, early APP can shorten the time of nucleic acid negative conversion and the length of hospital stay, but its effect on preventing disease progression cannot be determined.