Antiviral therapy · 2022
Socioeconomic status largely explains integrase inhibitors-related body composition differences in chronically infected men living with HIV.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wisch Julie K, Cooley Sarah A, Yarasheski Kevin E, Cade W Todd, Reeds Dominic N, Nelson Brittany, Alemu Ruth, Burdo Tricia H, Ances Beau M
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Substantial body composition alterations have been reported after starting combined antiretroviral therapy (cART). We characterized a cohort of chronically infected and virologically suppressed (VL < 50 copies/ml) men (≥50 years old) living with HIV (MLWH) who were switched to integrase inhibitors (INSTI), and compared their body composition parameters and proinflammatory/endocrine profiles to age-matched MLWH on integrase inhibitor free (non-INSTI) regimens, taking into account neighborhood-level measures of socioeconomic status (SES). In addition, we used previously published HIV-seronegative men of the same age as controls.
METHODS: We used dual energy X-ray absorptiometry to quantify body composition parameters, and measured plasma proinflammatory/endocrine markers in 56 MLWH. We compared body composition to a publicly available dataset of 450 HIV-seronegative men of similar age. Within the MLWH group, body composition and plasma proinflammatory/endocrine markers were compared between individuals on INSTI and non-INSTI regimens, accounting for SES.
RESULTS: Men living with HIV tended to have a greater android/gynoid ratio compared to HIV-seronegative men (p < 0.001). INSTI usage in MLWH was associated with lower adiposity measures when compared to non-INSTI, although these differences largely disappeared after controlling for SES. Proinflammatory/endocrine markers were similar for INSTI and non-INSTI MLWH.
CONCLUSIONS: Among cART-experienced MLWH, those receiving INSTI-containing regimens had modestly lower adiposity compared to non-INSTI MLWH, although these differences were explained by SES. Future studies examining the relationship between INSTI use and body composition should consider the impact of SES.
METHODS: We used dual energy X-ray absorptiometry to quantify body composition parameters, and measured plasma proinflammatory/endocrine markers in 56 MLWH. We compared body composition to a publicly available dataset of 450 HIV-seronegative men of similar age. Within the MLWH group, body composition and plasma proinflammatory/endocrine markers were compared between individuals on INSTI and non-INSTI regimens, accounting for SES.
RESULTS: Men living with HIV tended to have a greater android/gynoid ratio compared to HIV-seronegative men (p < 0.001). INSTI usage in MLWH was associated with lower adiposity measures when compared to non-INSTI, although these differences largely disappeared after controlling for SES. Proinflammatory/endocrine markers were similar for INSTI and non-INSTI MLWH.
CONCLUSIONS: Among cART-experienced MLWH, those receiving INSTI-containing regimens had modestly lower adiposity compared to non-INSTI MLWH, although these differences were explained by SES. Future studies examining the relationship between INSTI use and body composition should consider the impact of SES.