Frontiers in surgery · 2026
Effect of aesthetic nursing interventions on the health-related quality of life of cervical cancer patients after treatment.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tan Haizhen, Yang Xi
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of aesthetic nursing interventions on postoperative quality of life, body image, and psychological outcomes in patients with cervical cancer.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 210 patients undergoing cervical cancer surgery between January 2022 and June 2024. Patients were categorized into an aesthetic nursing intervention group (n = 90) and a basic nursing group (n = 120). Outcomes were assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 as the primary quality-of-life measure, with the SF-36 as a supplementary generic health-status measure, together with the BIS, BIDQ, GAD-7, and PHQ-9 at 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively. Between-group differences were analyzed using non-parametric tests, and longitudinal changes were evaluated using linear mixed-effects models. Exploratory multivariable regression was conducted to assess time-dependent effects.
RESULTS: Patients receiving aesthetic nursing demonstrated significantly better quality of life scores (EORTC QLQ-C30) and improved body image and anxiety outcomes compared with the basic nursing group (P < 0.05). Improvements were more pronounced during the mid- to late postoperative period. Regression analysis indicated that aesthetic nursing was associated with improved outcomes over time, particularly after the early postoperative phase.
CONCLUSIONS: Aesthetic nursing interventions may improve postoperative quality of life, body image, and anxiety in patients with cervical cancer. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 210 patients undergoing cervical cancer surgery between January 2022 and June 2024. Patients were categorized into an aesthetic nursing intervention group (n = 90) and a basic nursing group (n = 120). Outcomes were assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 as the primary quality-of-life measure, with the SF-36 as a supplementary generic health-status measure, together with the BIS, BIDQ, GAD-7, and PHQ-9 at 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively. Between-group differences were analyzed using non-parametric tests, and longitudinal changes were evaluated using linear mixed-effects models. Exploratory multivariable regression was conducted to assess time-dependent effects.
RESULTS: Patients receiving aesthetic nursing demonstrated significantly better quality of life scores (EORTC QLQ-C30) and improved body image and anxiety outcomes compared with the basic nursing group (P < 0.05). Improvements were more pronounced during the mid- to late postoperative period. Regression analysis indicated that aesthetic nursing was associated with improved outcomes over time, particularly after the early postoperative phase.
CONCLUSIONS: Aesthetic nursing interventions may improve postoperative quality of life, body image, and anxiety in patients with cervical cancer. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.