MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1164/rccm.201902-0383oc

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2019

Improving Lung Function in Severe Heterogenous Emphysema with the Spiration Valve System (EMPROVE). A Multicenter, Open-Label Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Criner Gerard J, Delage Antoine, Voelker Kirk, Hogarth D Kyle, Majid Adnan, Zgoda Michael, Lazarus Donald R, Casal Roberto, Benzaquen Sadia B, Holladay Robert C, Wellikoff Adam, Calero Karel, Rumbak Mark J, Branca Paul R, Abu-Hijleh Muhanned, Mallea Jorge M, Kalhan Ravi, Sachdeva Ashutosh, Kinsey C Matthew, Lamb Carla R, Reed Michael F, Abouzgheib Wissam B, Kaplan Phillip V, Marrujo Gregory X, Johnstone David W, Gasparri Mario G, Meade Arturo A, Hergott Christopher A, Reddy Chakravarthy, Mularski Richard A, Case Amy Hajari, Makani Samir S, Shepherd Ray W, Chen Benson, Holt Gregory E, Martel Simon

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Rationale: Less invasive, nonsurgical approaches are needed to treat severe emphysema.

Objectives

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the Spiration Valve System (SVS) versus optimal medical management.

Methods

In this multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled trial, subjects aged 40 years or older with severe, heterogeneous emphysema were randomized 2:1 to SVS with medical management (treatment) or medical management alone (control).Measurements and Main

Results

The primary efficacy outcome was the difference in mean FEV1 from baseline to 6 months. Secondary effectiveness outcomes included: difference in FEV1 responder rates, target lobe volume reduction, hyperinflation, health status, dyspnea, and exercise capacity. The primary safety outcome was the incidence of composite thoracic serious adverse events. All analyses were conducted by determining the 95% Bayesian credible intervals (BCIs) for the difference between treatment and control arms. Between October 2013 and May 2017, 172 participants (53.5% male; mean age, 67.4 yr) were randomized to treatment (n = 113) or control (n = 59). Mean FEV1 showed statistically significant improvements between the treatment and control groups-between-group difference at 6 and 12 months, respectively, of 0.101 L (95% BCI, 0.060-0.141) and 0.099 L (95% BCI, 0.048-0.151). At 6 months, the treatment group had statistically significant improvements in all secondary endpoints except 6-minute-walk distance. Composite thoracic serious adverse event incidence through 6 months was greater in the treatment group (31.0% vs. 11.9%), primarily due to a 12.4% incidence of serious pneumothorax.

Conclusions

In patients with severe heterogeneous emphysema, the SVS shows significant improvement in multiple efficacy outcomes, with an acceptable safety profile.Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01812447).

Для цитирования: Criner Gerard J, Delage Antoine, Voelker Kirk, Hogarth D Kyle, Majid Adnan, Zgoda Michael, Lazarus Donald R, Casal Roberto, Benzaquen Sadia B, Holladay Robert C, Wellikoff Adam, Calero Karel, Rumbak Mark J, Branca Paul R, Abu-Hijleh Muhanned, Mallea Jorge M, Kalhan Ravi, Sachdeva Ashutosh, Kinsey C Matthew, Lamb Carla R, Reed Michael F, Abouzgheib Wissam B, Kaplan Phillip V, Marrujo Gregory X, Johnstone David W, Gasparri Mario G, Meade Arturo A, Hergott Christopher A, Reddy Chakravarthy, Mularski Richard A, Case Amy Hajari, Makani Samir S, Shepherd Ray W, Chen Benson, Holt Gregory E, Martel Simon. Improving Lung Function in Severe Heterogenous Emphysema with the Spiration Valve System (EMPROVE). A Multicenter, Open-Label Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine. 2019. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201902-0383oc.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.