MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/jsm.0000000000000246

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical journal of sport medicine : official journal of the Canadian Academy of Sport Medicine · 2015

Ethical, Legal, and Administrative Considerations for Preparticipation Evaluation for Wilderness Sports and Adventures.

Young Craig C, Campbell Aaron D, Lemery Jay, Young David S

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Preparticipation evaluations (PPEs) are common in team, organized, or traditional sports but not common in wilderness sports or adventures. Regarding ethical, legal, and administrative considerations, the same principles can be used as in traditional sports. Clinicians should be trained to perform such a PPE to avoid missing essential components and to maximize the quality of the PPE. In general, participants' privacy should be observed; office-based settings may be best for professional and billing purposes, and adequate documentation of a complete evaluation, including clearance issues, should be essential components. Additional environmental and personal health issues relative to the wilderness activity should be documented, and referral for further screening should be made as deemed necessary, if unable to be performed by the primary clinician. Travel medicine principles should be incorporated, and recommendations for travel or adventure insurance should be made.

Для цитирования: Young Craig C, Campbell Aaron D, Lemery Jay, Young David S. Ethical, Legal, and Administrative Considerations for Preparticipation Evaluation for Wilderness Sports and Adventures.. Clinical journal of sport medicine : official journal of the Canadian Academy of Sport Medicine. 2015. DOI: 10.1097/jsm.0000000000000246.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.