MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2147/jpr.s130501

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of pain research · 2017

Osteopathy for primary headache patients: a systematic review.

Cerritelli Francesco, Lacorte Eleonora, Ruffini Nuria, Vanacore Nicola

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aimed to assess the efficacy, effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) in patients with headache.

BACKGROUND

Migraine is one of the most common and disabling medical conditions. It affects more than 15% of the general population, causing high global socioeconomic costs, and the currently available treatment options are inadequate.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed all available studies investigating the use of OMT in patients with migraine and other forms of headache.

RESULTS

The search of literature produced six studies, five of which were eligible for review. The reviewed papers collectively support the notion that patients with migraine can benefit from OMT. OMT could most likely reduce the number of episodes per month as well as drug use. None of the included studies, however, was classified as low risk of bias according to the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias.

CONCLUSION

The results from this systematic review show a preliminary low level of evidence that OMT is effective in the management of headache. However, studies with more rigorous designs and methodology are needed to strengthen this evidence. Moreover, this review suggests that new manual interventions for the treatment of acute migraine are available and developing.

Для цитирования: Cerritelli Francesco, Lacorte Eleonora, Ruffini Nuria, Vanacore Nicola. Osteopathy for primary headache patients: a systematic review.. Journal of pain research. 2017. DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s130501.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.