Canadian journal of gastroenterology = Journal canadien de gastroenterologie · 2006
Hydrogen breath test for diagnosis of lactose malabsorption: the importance of timing and the number of breath samples.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Di Camillo Mauro, Marinaro Vanessa, Argnani Fiorenza, Foglietta Tiziana, Vernia Piero
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The hydrogen breath test (H(2)BT) is the most widely used procedure in the diagnostic workup of lactose malabsorption and lactose intolerance.
AIM: To establish whether a simplified two- or three-sample test may reduce time, costs and staff resources without reducing the sensitivity of the procedure.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from 1,112 patients (292 men, 820 women) with a positive 4 h, nine-sample H(2)BT were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were stratified according to the degree of lactose malabsorption, the occurrence and type of symptoms. Loss of sensitivity in the procedure was evaluated taking into account two-sample tests (0 min and 120 min or 0 min and 210 min) or three-sample tests (0 min, 120 min and 180 min or 0 min, 120 min and 210 min).
RESULTS: Using a two-sample test (0 min and 120 min or 0 min and 210 min) the false-negative rate was 33.4% and 22.7%, respectively. With a three-sample test (0 min, 120 min and 180 min or 0 min, 120 min or 210 min), lactose malabsorption was diagnosed in 91.2% (1,014 of 1,112) patients and in 96.1% (1,068 of 1,112) patients, respectively. Of 594 patients with abdominal symptoms, 158 (26.6%) and 73 (12.2%) would have false-negative results with 0 min and 120 min or 0 min and 210 min two-sample tests, respectively. The three-sample tests, 0 min, 120 min and 180 min or 0 min, 120 min and 210 min, have a false-negative rate of 5.9% and 2.1%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: A three-sample H(2)BT is time- and cost-sparing without significant loss of sensitivity for the diagnosis both of lactose malabsorption and lactose intolerance.
AIM: To establish whether a simplified two- or three-sample test may reduce time, costs and staff resources without reducing the sensitivity of the procedure.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from 1,112 patients (292 men, 820 women) with a positive 4 h, nine-sample H(2)BT were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were stratified according to the degree of lactose malabsorption, the occurrence and type of symptoms. Loss of sensitivity in the procedure was evaluated taking into account two-sample tests (0 min and 120 min or 0 min and 210 min) or three-sample tests (0 min, 120 min and 180 min or 0 min, 120 min and 210 min).
RESULTS: Using a two-sample test (0 min and 120 min or 0 min and 210 min) the false-negative rate was 33.4% and 22.7%, respectively. With a three-sample test (0 min, 120 min and 180 min or 0 min, 120 min or 210 min), lactose malabsorption was diagnosed in 91.2% (1,014 of 1,112) patients and in 96.1% (1,068 of 1,112) patients, respectively. Of 594 patients with abdominal symptoms, 158 (26.6%) and 73 (12.2%) would have false-negative results with 0 min and 120 min or 0 min and 210 min two-sample tests, respectively. The three-sample tests, 0 min, 120 min and 180 min or 0 min, 120 min and 210 min, have a false-negative rate of 5.9% and 2.1%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: A three-sample H(2)BT is time- and cost-sparing without significant loss of sensitivity for the diagnosis both of lactose malabsorption and lactose intolerance.