Case reports in ophthalmology · 2012
Chickenpox chorioretinitis with retinal exudates and periphlebitis.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kitamei Hirokuni, Namba Kenichi, Kitaichi Nobuyoshi, Wakayama Akiko, Ohno Shigeaki, Ishida Susumu
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Chickenpox is rarely associated with posterior segment inflammation. We report on a case of unilateral chickenpox chorioretinitis with retinal exudates and periphlebitis.
CASE PRESENTATION: A 21-year-old healthy man, who suffered from chickenpox 2 weeks prior to symptom development, exhibited mild anterior chamber cells, vitreous opacity, sheathing of retinal veins, and yellow-white exudates in his right eye. Varicella zoster virus DNA was detected by polymerase chain reaction in the aqueous humor. He was treated with intravenous acyclovir followed by oral prednisolone and valaciclovir. Aqueous cells quickly disappeared and retinal exudates diminished within 1 month, leaving faint retinal scarring. Retinal arteritis had never been observed in this patient.
CONCLUSIONS: ALTHOUGH THE OCULAR FINDINGS IN THIS CASE WERE SIMILAR TO ACUTE RETINAL NECROSIS (ARN), THE CLINICAL FEATURES DIFFERED FROM ARN IN THE FOLLOWING POINTS: (1) mild anterior chamber inflammation, (2) absence of retinal arteritis, and (3) prompt resolution of inflammatory findings. The distinctive clinical features indicated that chorioretinitis associated with chickenpox may not have the same pathological conditions as ARN.
CASE PRESENTATION: A 21-year-old healthy man, who suffered from chickenpox 2 weeks prior to symptom development, exhibited mild anterior chamber cells, vitreous opacity, sheathing of retinal veins, and yellow-white exudates in his right eye. Varicella zoster virus DNA was detected by polymerase chain reaction in the aqueous humor. He was treated with intravenous acyclovir followed by oral prednisolone and valaciclovir. Aqueous cells quickly disappeared and retinal exudates diminished within 1 month, leaving faint retinal scarring. Retinal arteritis had never been observed in this patient.
CONCLUSIONS: ALTHOUGH THE OCULAR FINDINGS IN THIS CASE WERE SIMILAR TO ACUTE RETINAL NECROSIS (ARN), THE CLINICAL FEATURES DIFFERED FROM ARN IN THE FOLLOWING POINTS: (1) mild anterior chamber inflammation, (2) absence of retinal arteritis, and (3) prompt resolution of inflammatory findings. The distinctive clinical features indicated that chorioretinitis associated with chickenpox may not have the same pathological conditions as ARN.