DOI 10.1007/s12672-025-03151-5
Metabolomic Understanding of variable risk factors for kidney cancer: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Circulating metabolites have been found to play an important role in the development of renal cancer, however, the specific pathways and mechanisms of their influence are still largely unknown. We aimed to investigate the role of metabolites in kidney cancer development and to explain the development of kidney cancer from a genetic perspective.
METHOD: We explored the role of plasma metabolites and urinary metabolites in kidney cancer using two-sample mendelian randomization (MR) separately and validated it using multiple databases; in addition, we performed rigorous tests of pleiotropy and heterogeneity to ensure that the results were robust. Next, we explored the role of common modifiable risk factors in kidney cancer and identified the specific mechanisms by which risk factors affect kidney cancer by joint analysis of TCGA and GEO databases.
RESULTS
Through MR analysis, we identified six plasma metabolites and one urinary metabolite that play a major role in kidney cancer, confirmed the effects of BMI and type 1 diabetes mellitus on kidney cancer, and constructed the BMI-plasma metabolite-kidney cancer causality networks through mediated MR. In addition, we found that SLPI could significantly affect the prognosis of kidney cancer through multiple databases' joint analyses, and through multiple methods explored the pathways of SLPI's influence on kidney cancer.
CONCLUSIONS
In a word, this study shows that BMI can significantly increase the risk of kidney cancer, while the plasma metabolites 4-guanidinobutanoate may partially mitigate this risk, and that SLPI promotes tumorigenesis in obesity-related renal cancer by regulating protease activity.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.