Preparing clinical research data for artificial intelligence readiness: insights from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases data centric challenge.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
The success of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) approaches in biomedical research depends on the quality of the underlying data. The National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) Data Centric Challenge was designed to address the challenge of making raw clinical research data AI ready, with a focus on type 1 diabetes studies available in the NIDDK Central Repository (NIDDK-CR). This paper aims to present a structured methodology for enhancing the AI readiness of clinical datasets.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
We detail a systematic approach for data aggregation and preprocessing, including binning continuous data, processing text features, managing missing values, and encoding for categorical variables while maintaining the data integrity and compatibility with ML algorithms.
RESULTS
We applied the proposed methodology to transform raw clinical data from type 1 diabetes studies in the NIDDK-CR into a structured, AI-ready dataset. The evaluation process validated the effectiveness of our AI-readiness enhancement steps and explored the potential use cases in type 1 diabetes research.
DISCUSSION: The methodology discussed in this paper will serve as guidance for preparing data for AI-driven clinical research, with the resulting AI-ready data to serve as a training tool for building and improving AI/ML model performance.
CONCLUSION
We present a generalizable framework for preparing clinical research data for AI applications. The resulting datasets lay a strong foundation for downstream AI/ML applications, setting the stage for a new era of data-driven discoveries.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.