DOI 10.1016/s0003-3944(00)00267-4
[Laparoscopic treatment of perforated duodenal ulcers. Results of a retrospective multicentric study. French Society of Laparoscopic Surgery].
Аннотация
STUDY AIM: The aim of this multicentric retrospective study was to report procedures, mortality and morbidity rate in a series of patients operated on for perforated duodenal ulcer with a laparoscopic approach.
PATIENTS AND
METHODS
Four-hundred and nineteen patients from 18 centers were included. The duration of the study was ten years (1990 to 1999). There were 299 men and 120 women aged from 19 to 98 years (mean: 48 years). The ASA scores were as follows: I (48.7%), II (31.3%), III (17.5%), IV (2.5%). The mean duration between the onset of perforation and the time of operation was 13.4 hours (range: 1-70). The surgical procedures were suture (76.7%), epiploplasty (9.9%), only irrigation of the abdominal cavity (2.7%).
RESULTS
Conversion into laparotomy was performed in 10.6% of the patients. Mean operative time was 85 minutes. The morbidity and mortality rates were 13.4 and 1.4% respectively. Seventeen patients were reoperated because of fistula (n = 5), intra-abdominal abscess (n = 5), small bowel obstruction (n = 4), bleeding ulcer (n = 1), iatrogenic perforation of the gallbladder (n = 1) and small bowel (n = 1). Mean hospital stay was 8.5 days. All patients were discharged with a medical treatment of the peptic ulcer disease and in most of the cases, with antibiotics for Helicobacter pylori eradication. Six patients out of 96 with a medical history of chronic peptic ulcer underwent a vagotomy.
CONCLUSION
Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcer is a safe option providing low rates of morbidity, reoperation and mortality, and can be considered the treatment of choice.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.