Acta cytologica · 2026
Qualitative System for Assessing Cytologic-Histologic Correlation in Non-Gynecologic Cytology Specimens.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Aly Fatima Zahra, Shumate Donald, Khambaty Safiya Nur, Nagarakanti Chenchu
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Cytologic-histologic correlation (CHC) is a requirement by the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA) for laboratories that perform cytology-based gynecologic cancer screening. Gynecologic cytology has well-established criteria for performing CHC. To our knowledge, there is limited literature about the implementation of CHC protocols for non-gynecologic specimens such as fine-needle aspirations. Non-gynecologic cytology can provide useful information to clinicians by guiding next steps in management. CHC also provides a secondary utility for assessing staff competencies. The College of American Pathologists requires all laboratories to periodically assess competencies, and to perform proficiency testing to ensure diagnostic accuracy.
METHODS: We developed a system for real-time and/or retrospective CHC to recognize and grade any discordances that arise, and to review the causes of discrepancy. We describe an organ specific (pancreas) system of CHC with scoring of degree of discordance and benchmark setting of acceptable discrepancy for cytotechnologists and cytopathologists.
RESULTS: Root cause analysis in discordant cases identifies the key issues that impact cytological diagnostic accuracy.
CONCLUSION: This model can be utilized by any non-gynecologic cytology system to inform accuracy of diagnosis and effectively identify areas of improvement.
METHODS: We developed a system for real-time and/or retrospective CHC to recognize and grade any discordances that arise, and to review the causes of discrepancy. We describe an organ specific (pancreas) system of CHC with scoring of degree of discordance and benchmark setting of acceptable discrepancy for cytotechnologists and cytopathologists.
RESULTS: Root cause analysis in discordant cases identifies the key issues that impact cytological diagnostic accuracy.
CONCLUSION: This model can be utilized by any non-gynecologic cytology system to inform accuracy of diagnosis and effectively identify areas of improvement.