DOI 10.1016/j.ejrad.2026.113062
Improving the efficiency of brain metastases monitoring using a semi-automatic colorimetric longitudinal tool.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
After stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases, MRI follow-up is essential to detect lesion variations. Traditional diagnostic methods, including volumetric changes often face limitations in precision and timeliness.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of an automatic colorimetric segmentation tool (LOBI, IntellisSpace Portal viewer, Version 11, Philips Healthcare) against volumetric analysis in detecting radiological progression (RP) and to explore their potential integration into routine practice.
MATERIAL AND
METHODS
From a retrospective cohort of 125 patients and 298 brain metastases treated at the University Hospital of XXX, 1170 comparisons between two consecutive MRIs were conducted using both the LOBI tool and a volumetric comparison based on manual segmentation performed by four radiologists. Various volumetric cut-offs and the LOBI tool were used and compared to the gold standard (RP) using diagnostic metrics such as balanced accuracy. RP was collected from follow-up data (biopsy, surgery, or multidisciplinary meeting boards) and encompassed both local relapse and radionecrosis. The average analysis times were compared using Student's t-test.
RESULTS
Against the reference diagnosis of radiological progression, LOBI achieved a balanced accuracy of 63.8% with an NPV of 94.0% (Se = 55.3%; Sp = 72.3%). LOBI was significantly faster than manual volumetric monitoring (29svs164s).
CONCLUSIONS
LOBI significantly reduced the measurement times while achieving similar performance results. We propose to combine LOBI as a screening tool and volumetry as a refining tool in routine practice.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.