MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · SCI nursing : a publication of the American Association of Spinal Cord Injury Nurses · 2004

Lessons learned in implementing SCI clinical practice guidelines.

Guihan Maylou, Bosshart Helen T, Nelson Audrey

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПоддержка правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

While clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) were designed as a tool to improve patient outcomes, decrease practice variation, and optimize resource utilization, providers often encounter significant barriers to integrating these into clinical practice. A study was conducted at six spinal cord injury (SCI) centers in the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to improve provider adherence and patient outcomes of two CPGs: Prevention of Thromboembolism in Spinal Cord Injury and Neurogenic Bowel Management in Adults With Spinal Cord Injury. To design effective implementation strategies, focus groups were conducted to identify provider-perceived barriers and facilitators to implementing recommendations for each of the SCI guidelines. Based on this information, four guideline implementation strategies were designed: (a) use of local opinion leaders ("clinical champions"), (b) patient-mediated interventions, (c) standardized documentation template/standing orders, and (d) social marketing/outreach visits. These strategies were implemented at each site. This article identifies "lessons learned" during the process of trying to get these CPGs embedded into clinical practice.

Для цитирования: Guihan Maylou, Bosshart Helen T, Nelson Audrey. Lessons learned in implementing SCI clinical practice guidelines.. SCI nursing : a publication of the American Association of Spinal Cord Injury Nurses. 2004.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.