MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1038/sj.sc.3101131

Медицинская библиотека · Spinal cord · 2001

A comparison of bowel care patterns in patients with spinal cord injury: upper motor neuron bowel vs lower motor neuron bowel.

Yim S Y, Yoon S H, Lee I Y, Rah E W, Moon H W

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

STUDY

DESIGN

A face-to-face interview survey.

OBJECTIVE

To compare bowel care patterns in spinal cord injury (SCI) patients based on type of neurogenic bowel.

SETTING

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation of a tertiary university hospital in Suwon, Korea.

METHODS

Among chronic SCI patients, 22 patients with upper motor neuron bowel (UMNB) and 20 patients with lower motor neuron bowel (LMNB) participated in an interview survey for the evaluation of bowel care patterns.

RESULTS

The patients with LMNB demonstrated increased frequency of defecation, increased frequency of fecal incontinence, increased use of oral medications for bowel care, increased required time for defecation and more diet modification than those with UMNB (P < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the subjective difficulty of bowel care. Among several available bowel care methods, suppositories were used most frequently by the UMNB group, whereas the Valsalva maneuver was the most frequently used method by the LMNB group.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with LMNB tend to suffer more difficulties in management of their neurogenic bowel than those with UMNB. Therefore, more intensive and aggressive bowel care programs should be provided for SCI patients with LMNB.

Для цитирования: Yim S Y, Yoon S H, Lee I Y, Rah E W, Moon H W. A comparison of bowel care patterns in patients with spinal cord injury: upper motor neuron bowel vs lower motor neuron bowel.. Spinal cord. 2001. DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101131.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.