DOI 10.1227/ons.0000000000000618
Influence of Patient and Technical Variables on Combined Direct and Indirect Cerebral Revascularization: Case Series.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Cerebral bypass for flow augmentation is an important technique for selected neurosurgical patients, with multiple techniques used (direct, indirect, or combined).
OBJECTIVE
To assess the impact of patient and technical variables on direct and indirect bypass flow after combined revascularization.
METHODS
This was a retrospective, single-institution review of patients undergoing direct superficial temporal artery-to-middle cerebral artery bypass with indirect encephaloduro-myosynangiosis for moyamoya disease and steno-occlusive cerebrovascular disease over a 2-year period. We evaluated the effect of baseline patient characteristics, preoperative imaging characteristics, and operative variables on direct and indirect patency grades.
RESULTS
Twenty-six hemispheres (8 moyamoya disease and 18 steno-occlusive cerebrovascular disease) in 23 patients were treated with combined revascularization. The mean patient age was 53.4 ± 19.1 years. Direct bypass patency was 96%. Over a mean follow-up of 8.3 ± 5.4 months, there were 3 strokes in the treated hemispheres (11.5%). The mean modified Rankin Scale score improved from 1.3 ± 1.1 preoperatively to 0.7 ± 0.8 postoperatively. Preservation of the nondonor superficial temporal artery branch was associated with a lower direct bypass grade ( P < .01), whereas greater mean time to maximum perfusion (Tmax)> 4 and >6 seconds and mismatch volumes were associated with higher direct bypass grades ( P < .05). Tmax >4-second volume inversely predicted indirect bypass patency.
CONCLUSION
Patient and technical variables may influence the relative contributions of the direct and indirect components of combined revascularizations.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.