MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.7196/samj.5930

Медицинская библиотека · South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde · 2012

Traditional eye medication and pterygium occurrence in Limpopo Province.

Anguria Peter, Ntuli Sam, Interewicz Bozenna, Carmichael Trevor

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The relative importance of environmental and hereditary factors in the occurrence of pterygium in African blacks has not been reported.

AIM: To investigate the relative significance of factors associated with pterygium occurrence.

METHODS

This was a prospective case-controlled study where 150 pterygium patients and 150 controls participated. Interviews were conducted, eyes examined and multivariate analysis done. The families of 51 pterygium cases and 50 controls were examined for presence of pterygium.

RESULTS

Of 150 cases and 150 controls, 79 (52.6%) and 60 (40%) used traditional eye drops (odds ratio (OR) 2.03; p=0.009. Ten cases (6.6%) and 26 controls (17.3%) had unstable tear film (OR 0.30; p=0.007. Forty-six cases (30.6%) and 15 controls (10%) reported a positive family history (OR 3.93; p<0.001). Groups of 3 - 5 pterygium cases in a household occurred in 36 of 51 pterygium families (70.5%) v. 1 of 50 controls (2%).

CONCLUSIONS

Pterygium occurrence was associated with the use of traditional eye drops, a positive family history and having groups of diagnosed pterygium-affected relatives. However, unstable tear film seemed protective against pterygium occurrence.

Для цитирования: Anguria Peter, Ntuli Sam, Interewicz Bozenna, Carmichael Trevor. Traditional eye medication and pterygium occurrence in Limpopo Province.. South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde. 2012. DOI: 10.7196/samj.5930.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.