MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/02699052.2022.2034952

Медицинская библиотека · Brain injury · 2022

A prospective observational cohort study of traumatic brain injury in the northern region of Sweden.

Magnusson Beatrice M, Isaksson Emil, Koskinen Lars-Owe D

СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Generally, to map epidemiological and demographic features of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) in Umeå county, Sweden. Specifically, to evaluate the subjects needing a computed tomography (CT) of the head after suffering from TBI and frequencies of 1) intracranial lesions detected with CT, 2) need for neurosurgical intervention and 3) admission to hospital.

METHODS

Patients with a suspected TBI, undergoing CT within 24 hours of arrival to hospital, were included in a database for evaluation.

RESULTS

Out of 302 patients (63% male), 83% were GCS 13-15, 7% were GCS 9-12 and 10% were GCS <9. The frequency of abnormal CT findings was 23% in GCS 13-15, 67% in GCS 9-12 and 97% in GCS <9. Neurosurgical intervention was needed by 4% of those with GCS 13-15, 52% of those with GCS 9-12 and by 76% of those with GCS <9.

CONCLUSIONS

Subjects with GCS 13-15  had higher frequencies of abnormal CT findings, need for neurosurgical intervention and hospital admission than previously reported. A similar trend was observed for patients with GCS 9-12, which can be of serious nature, with a higher frequency of need for neurosurgical intervention than previously described.

Для цитирования: Magnusson Beatrice M, Isaksson Emil, Koskinen Lars-Owe D. A prospective observational cohort study of traumatic brain injury in the northern region of Sweden.. Brain injury. 2022. DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2022.2034952.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.