MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4187/respcare.06319

Медицинская библиотека · Respiratory care · 2018

Effects of Diaphragmatic Breathing With and Without Pursed-Lips Breathing in Subjects With COPD.

Mendes Liliane Ps, Moraes Karoline S, Hoffman Mariana, Vieira Danielle Sr, Ribeiro-Samora Giane A, Lage Susan M, Britto Raquel R, Parreira Verônica F

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Breathing exercises, such as diaphragmatic breathing and pursed-lips breathing, play a role in some individuals with COPD and might be considered for those patients who are unable to exercise. However, in the literature are reports of some adverse effects of diaphragmatic breathing in patients with COPD. Thus, the purpose of this study was to assess the effects of diaphragmatic breathing and diaphragmatic breathing combined with pursed-lips on chest wall kinematics, breathlessness, and chest wall asynchrony in subjects with COPD, and also to assess whether the combination of both exercises reduces the adverse effects of diaphragmatic breathing while maintaining its benefits.

METHODS

Seventeen subjects with COPD, mean ± SD, 65 ± 7 y of age, with a history of smoking and clinical stability without hospitalization or symptoms of exacerbation in the past 4 wk, were evaluated. On day 1, participants' characteristics were collected, and they learned diaphragmatic breathing and its combination with pursed-lips breathing. On day 2, the participants were evaluated by optoelectronic plethysmography with the participants in the seated position while performing breathing exercises.

RESULTS

Diaphragmatic breathing and diaphragmatic breathing plus pursed-lips breathing promoted a significant increase in chest wall tidal volume and its compartments as well as a reduction in breathing frequency compared with quiet breathing. No significant changes were observed in dyspnea or end-expiratory volume of the chest wall. A significant increase in asynchrony (inspiratory-expiratory phase ratio) was observed during diaphragmatic breathing and diaphragmatic breathing plus pursed-lips breathing compared with quiet breathing, with no differences observed between the exercises.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the increase in asynchrony, both breathing exercises were able to improve chest wall volumes without affecting dyspnea. The combination of exercises maintained the benefits but did not reduce the adverse effects of diaphragmatic breathing.

Для цитирования: Mendes Liliane Ps, Moraes Karoline S, Hoffman Mariana, Vieira Danielle Sr, Ribeiro-Samora Giane A, Lage Susan M, Britto Raquel R, Parreira Verônica F. Effects of Diaphragmatic Breathing With and Without Pursed-Lips Breathing in Subjects With COPD.. Respiratory care. 2018. DOI: 10.4187/respcare.06319.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.