MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.accpm.2024.101346

Медицинская библиотека · Anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine · 2024

Videolaryngoscope versus conventional technique for insertion of a transesophageal echocardiography probe in intubated ICU patients (VIDLARECO trial): A randomized clinical trial.

Taboada Manuel, Cariñena Agustín, Estany-Gestal Ana, Iglesias-Álvarez Diego, Veiras Sonia, Martínez Adrián, Eiras María, De Miguel Manuela, Selas Salomé, Martínez-Monzonis Amparo, Pereira Pedro, Bastos-Fernández María, González-Salvado Violeta, Álvarez-Barrado María, Ferreiroa Esteban, Caruezo Valentín, Costa Jose, Naveira Alberto, Otero Pablo, Adrio Belén, Martínez-Cereijo Jose Manuel, Fernández Ángel, González-Juanatey José Ramón, Álvarez Julián, Seoane-Pillado Teresa

Рандомизированное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Transesophageal echocardiogram probe insertion in intubated critically ill patients can be difficult, leading to complications, such as gastric bleeding or lesions in the oropharyngeal mucosa. We hypothesised that the use of a videolaryngoscope would facilitate the first attempt at insertion of the transesophageal echocardiogram probe and would decrease the incidence of complications compared to the conventional insertion technique.

METHODS

In this clinical trial, patients were randomly assigned the insertion of a transesophageal echocardiogram probe using a videolaryngoscope or conventional technique. The primary outcome was the successful transesophageal echocardiogram probe insertion on the first attempt. The secondary outcomes included total success rate, number of insertion attempts, and incidence of pharyngeal complications.

RESULTS

A total of 100 intubated critically ill patients were enrolled. The success rate of transesophageal echocardiogram probe insertion on the first attempt was higher in the videolaryngoscope group than in the conventional group (90% vs. 58%; absolute difference, 32%; 95% CI 16%-48%; p < 0.001). The overall success rate was higher in the videolaryngoscope group than in the conventional group (100% vs. 72%; absolute difference, 28%; 95% CI 16%-40%; p < 0.001). The incidence of pharyngeal mucosal injury was smaller in the videolaryngoscope group than in the conventional group (14% vs. 52%; absolute difference, 38%; 95% CI 21%-55%; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that in intubated critically ill patients required transesophageal echocardiogram, the use of videolaryngoscope resulted in higher successful insertion on the first attempt with lower rate of complications when compared with the conventional insertion technique.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04980976.

Для цитирования: Taboada Manuel, Cariñena Agustín, Estany-Gestal Ana, Iglesias-Álvarez Diego, Veiras Sonia, Martínez Adrián, Eiras María, De Miguel Manuela, Selas Salomé, Martínez-Monzonis Amparo, Pereira Pedro, Bastos-Fernández María, González-Salvado Violeta, Álvarez-Barrado María, Ferreiroa Esteban, Caruezo Valentín, Costa Jose, Naveira Alberto, Otero Pablo, Adrio Belén, Martínez-Cereijo Jose Manuel, Fernández Ángel, González-Juanatey José Ramón, Álvarez Julián, Seoane-Pillado Teresa. Videolaryngoscope versus conventional technique for insertion of a transesophageal echocardiography probe in intubated ICU patients (VIDLARECO trial): A randomized clinical trial.. Anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.accpm.2024.101346.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.