Interobserver variability of 64-slice computed tomography for the quantification of non-calcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque.

PURPOSE: Multidetector CT (MDCT) is a reliable tool to assess and quantify calcified plaque in coronary arteries. Only very limited information is available concerning the accuracy of MDCT for evaluating non-calcified plaque. We determined the interobserver variability for measuring non-calcified plaque volumes in the three main coronary arteries using 64-slice computed tomography.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated data sets of 41 patients who received a 64-slice CT scan (Sensation 64, Siemens Forchheim, Germany, 330 msec rotation, 0.6 mm collimation, 60 ml contrast agent i. v. at 5 ml/sec) due to suspected stable coronary artery disease. The patients showed presence of non-calcified plaque in the proximal part of at least one main coronary artery. The image quality was defined on the basis of a 4-point rating scale. Two independent and blinded investigators measured the plaque volume of the non-calcified plaque by manually tracing plaque areas in contiguous cross-sectional reconstructions rendered along the vessel centerline using a slice thickness of 1 mm and an increment of 0.5 mm. The interobserver variability was evaluated and the influence of plaque volume and image quality on interobserver variability was determined.

RESULTS

The mean volume of non-calcified plaque was 157 +/- 85 mm (3), 76 +/- 43 mm (3) and 133 +/- 80 mm (3) for the LAD, LCX and RCA, respectively (LAD vs. LCX: p < 0.01; LAD vs. RCA: p = 0.33; LCX vs. RCA: p < 0.01). There was a mean absolute difference in plaque volume between the two observers of 23 +/- 15 mm (3), of 20 +/- 9 mm (3) and of 38 +/- 21 mm (3), which corresponds to a mean interobserver variability of 17 +/- 10 %, 29 +/- 13 % and 32 +/- 13 % for the LAD, LCX and RCA, respectively (LAD vs. LCX: p < 0.01; LAD vs. RCA: p < 0.01; LCX vs. RCA: p = 0.87). A significant inverse correlation between interobserver variability and the extent of the plaque volume (r = - 0.48; p = 0.01) was found. Interobserver variability was dependent on image quality: The highest image quality was observed in the LAD (2.4 +/- 0.5), while the image quality in the LCX (2.1 +/- 0.7) and the RCA (2.0 +/- 0.6) was lower.

CONCLUSION

Interobserver variability for the quantification of non-calcified plaque volumes in 64-slice MDCT is substantial. Interobserver variability in the LAD was significantly lower than in the LCX and the RCA. This might be due to a larger mean plaque volume and better image quality in the LAD than in other coronary arteries.