Chest · 2003
D-dimer in acute aortic dissection.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Weber Thomas, Högler Sonja, Auer Johann, Berent Robert, Lassnig Elisabeth, Kvas Erich, Eber Bernd
Аннотация
STUDY OBJECTIVE: Laboratory testing plays a minor role in the assessment of aortic dissection. Its main value is in the exclusion of other diseases. Following an incidental observation, we systematically investigated the relationship between elevated d-dimer levels and acute aortic dissection.
DESIGN: We prospectively tested d-dimer levels in patients with suspected acute aortic dissection (10 patients). In addition, we investigated 14 patients who had received a confirmed diagnosis of thoracic aortic dissection during the previous 5 years, in whom d-dimer testing had been performed for differential diagnosis. Thirty-five patients with acute chest pain of other origin served as a control group.
SETTING: Tertiary referral hospital.
PATIENTS: Twelve patients had type A dissection (Stanford classification), and 12 patients had type B.
MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: A d-dimer analysis was performed (Tina-quant assay; Roche Diagnostics; Mannheim, Germany) [normal limit of the assay, 0.5 micro g/mL]. The result of the d-dimer test was positive (ie, > 0.5 micro g/mL) in all patients (sensitivity of the test, 100%) with a mean value of 9.4 micro g/mL and a range of 0.63 to 54.7 micro g/mL. The degree of the elevation was correlated to the delay from the onset of symptoms to laboratory testing (mean, 12.6 h; range, 1 to 120 h) and showed a trend to the extent of the dissection, but not to the outcome (14 patients could be discharged; 10 patients died).
CONCLUSIONS: Based on our observation, we suggest that testing for d-dimer should be part of the initial assessment of patients with chest pain, especially if aortic dissection is suspected. A negative test result makes the presence of the disease unlikely.
DESIGN: We prospectively tested d-dimer levels in patients with suspected acute aortic dissection (10 patients). In addition, we investigated 14 patients who had received a confirmed diagnosis of thoracic aortic dissection during the previous 5 years, in whom d-dimer testing had been performed for differential diagnosis. Thirty-five patients with acute chest pain of other origin served as a control group.
SETTING: Tertiary referral hospital.
PATIENTS: Twelve patients had type A dissection (Stanford classification), and 12 patients had type B.
MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: A d-dimer analysis was performed (Tina-quant assay; Roche Diagnostics; Mannheim, Germany) [normal limit of the assay, 0.5 micro g/mL]. The result of the d-dimer test was positive (ie, > 0.5 micro g/mL) in all patients (sensitivity of the test, 100%) with a mean value of 9.4 micro g/mL and a range of 0.63 to 54.7 micro g/mL. The degree of the elevation was correlated to the delay from the onset of symptoms to laboratory testing (mean, 12.6 h; range, 1 to 120 h) and showed a trend to the extent of the dissection, but not to the outcome (14 patients could be discharged; 10 patients died).
CONCLUSIONS: Based on our observation, we suggest that testing for d-dimer should be part of the initial assessment of patients with chest pain, especially if aortic dissection is suspected. A negative test result makes the presence of the disease unlikely.