Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 1992
Diagnosing infection in febrile granulocytopenic patients with indium-111-labeled human immunoglobulin G.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Oyen W J, Claessens R A, Raemaekers J M, de Pauw B E, van der Meer J W, Corstens F H
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Delineation of focal infection is a major problem in the management of febrile granulocytopenic patients. The utility of indium-111-labeled human nonspecific immunoglobulin G (In-111-IgG), a newly developed radiopharmaceutical for imaging focal inflammation, was reported in patients with adequate WBC counts. In the present study, we investigated whether In-111-IgG scintigraphy could be used to locate infection in granulocytopenic patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Granulocytopenic rats with focal infection were imaged after In-111-IgG injection. Thereafter, In-111-IgG scintigraphy was performed in 20 granulocytopenic patients. Images were obtained 4, 24, and 48 hours after injection of 75 mBq In-111-IgG. Scintigraphic findings were compared with clinical, roentgenologic, and ultrasonographic methods and culture results.
RESULTS: In the animal model high In-111-IgG accumulation was observed in the infectious focus. In the patients, 13 proven pulmonary, abdominal, joint, and soft tissue infections of both bacterial and fungal origin were detected adequately. In-111-IgG uptake not due to verified inflammation was observed in the large bowel of two patients. A thoracic wall infiltrate showing only mild inflammatory activity was not detected. Small toxoplasmosis lesions in heart, liver, and kidneys were obscured by physiologic In-111-IgG activity in these organs.
CONCLUSIONS: In-111-IgG scintigraphy is a useful technique to delineate focal infection in patients with granulocytopenia. Accumulation of the radiopharmaceutical does not appear to be granulocyte-mediated. In-111-IgG is a safe and convenient radiopharmaceutical that probably contributes to the early diagnosis of focal infection in granulocytopenic patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Granulocytopenic rats with focal infection were imaged after In-111-IgG injection. Thereafter, In-111-IgG scintigraphy was performed in 20 granulocytopenic patients. Images were obtained 4, 24, and 48 hours after injection of 75 mBq In-111-IgG. Scintigraphic findings were compared with clinical, roentgenologic, and ultrasonographic methods and culture results.
RESULTS: In the animal model high In-111-IgG accumulation was observed in the infectious focus. In the patients, 13 proven pulmonary, abdominal, joint, and soft tissue infections of both bacterial and fungal origin were detected adequately. In-111-IgG uptake not due to verified inflammation was observed in the large bowel of two patients. A thoracic wall infiltrate showing only mild inflammatory activity was not detected. Small toxoplasmosis lesions in heart, liver, and kidneys were obscured by physiologic In-111-IgG activity in these organs.
CONCLUSIONS: In-111-IgG scintigraphy is a useful technique to delineate focal infection in patients with granulocytopenia. Accumulation of the radiopharmaceutical does not appear to be granulocyte-mediated. In-111-IgG is a safe and convenient radiopharmaceutical that probably contributes to the early diagnosis of focal infection in granulocytopenic patients.