Journal of cataract and refractive surgery · 2008
Contrast sensitivity after refractive lens exchange with diffractive multifocal intraocular lens implantation in hyperopic eyes.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ferrer-Blasco Teresa, Montés-Micó Robert, Cerviño Alejandro, Alfonso José F, Fernández-Vega Luis
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate distance and near contrast sensitivity under photopic and mesopic conditions before and after refractive lens exchange (RLE) with implantation of a diffractive multifocal intraocular lens (IOL).
SETTING: University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
METHODS: Monocular contrast sensitivity function was measured with the Functional Acuity Contrast Test chart at distance and near under 3 luminance levels (85.0 cd/m(2), 5.0 cd/m(2), and 2.5 cd/m(2)) before and after RLE with bilateral AcrySof ReSTOR IOL implantation in 30 hyperopic eyes with presbyopia and low astigmatism (<or=1.0 diopter). Results after surgery were compared with those before surgery.
RESULTS: Six months postoperatively, the mean residual spherical equivalent refractive error was 0.21 diopter+/-0.19 (SD). The best corrected distance and near visual acuities were comparable to those before surgery. For distance vision, the safety index was 1.02 and the efficacy index was 0.91. For near vision, the values were 1.04 and 1.02, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between preoperative and postoperative results at any distance or spatial frequency or under any lighting condition (P>.1, t test).
CONCLUSIONS: Refractive lens exchange with implantation of a diffractive multifocal IOL gave good distance and near contrast sensitivity under photopic and mesopic conditions. Although mesopic contrast sensitivity was reduced at distance and near compared to that under photopic conditions, the performance was comparable to that with the natural lens preoperatively.
SETTING: University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
METHODS: Monocular contrast sensitivity function was measured with the Functional Acuity Contrast Test chart at distance and near under 3 luminance levels (85.0 cd/m(2), 5.0 cd/m(2), and 2.5 cd/m(2)) before and after RLE with bilateral AcrySof ReSTOR IOL implantation in 30 hyperopic eyes with presbyopia and low astigmatism (<or=1.0 diopter). Results after surgery were compared with those before surgery.
RESULTS: Six months postoperatively, the mean residual spherical equivalent refractive error was 0.21 diopter+/-0.19 (SD). The best corrected distance and near visual acuities were comparable to those before surgery. For distance vision, the safety index was 1.02 and the efficacy index was 0.91. For near vision, the values were 1.04 and 1.02, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between preoperative and postoperative results at any distance or spatial frequency or under any lighting condition (P>.1, t test).
CONCLUSIONS: Refractive lens exchange with implantation of a diffractive multifocal IOL gave good distance and near contrast sensitivity under photopic and mesopic conditions. Although mesopic contrast sensitivity was reduced at distance and near compared to that under photopic conditions, the performance was comparable to that with the natural lens preoperatively.