DOI 10.1016/j.jhlto.2024.100147
Differences in outcomes of combined heart-liver transplantation by primary cardiac diagnosis.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Combined heart-liver transplantation (CHLT) is a complex procedure with rising demand and is subject to ongoing assessment. Here, we provide an update on indications, patient outcomes, and risk factors.
METHODS
This retrospective study utilized CHLT data from the United Network for Organ Sharing registry between 1990 and 2023. Recipient and donor characteristics, and risk factors for mortality were analyzed using Cox regression hazard models. Recipient and graft survival at 30 days, 1 year, and 5 years were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method.
RESULTS
This cohort included 532 patients with median survival of 16.9 years (SD: 1.09). The most common indications for CHLT were congenital heart disease (36%) and dilated cardiomyopathy (31%). Patient survival at 30 days, 1 year, and 5 years were 94%, 85%, and 77%, respectively. Combined heart-liver graft survival was 93%, 85%, and 77%, respectively. Diabetes (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.74; p = 0.04) was associated with multigraft failure and mortality in multivariate analysis. Compared to congenital heart disease, dilated (HR: 0.55; p = 0.03) and restrictive myopathies (HR: 0.5; p = 0.03) were associated with improved graft and overall survival. Higher donor left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) was also associated with improved graft and overall survival (HR: 0.96; p = 0.008).
CONCLUSIONS
CHLTs are being performed at increasingly higher rates with comparable survival to single-organ transplants. Diabetes was associated with increased mortality. Recipient dilated or restrictive myopathies and higher donor EF were correlated with improved survival compared to congenital heart disease. Further studies are needed to better understand these observations.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.