MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1213/ane.0000000000006812

Медицинская библиотека · Anesthesia and analgesia · 2025

Thoracic Epidural Analgesia Is Not Associated With Improved Survival After Pancreatic Surgery: Long-Term Follow-Up of the Randomized Controlled PAKMAN Trial.

Klotz Rosa, Ahmed Azaz, Tremmel Anja, Büsch Christopher, Tenckhoff Solveig, Doerr-Harim Colette, Lock Johan F, Brede Elmar-Marc, Köninger Jörg, Schiff Jan-Henrik, Wittel Uwe A, Hötzel Alexander, Keck Tobias, Nau Carla, Amati Anca-Laura, Koch Christian, Diener Markus K, Weigand Markus A, Büchler Markus W, Knebel Phillip, Larmann Jan

Adaptive Clinical TrialEquivalence TrialСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеPragmatic Clinical TrialРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Perioperative thoracic epidural analgesia (EDA) and patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) are common forms of analgesia after pancreatic surgery. Current guidelines recommend EDA over PCIA, and evidence suggests that EDA may improve long-term survival after surgery, especially in cancer patients. The aim of this study was to determine whether perioperative EDA is associated with an improved patient prognosis compared to PCIA in pancreatic surgery.

METHODS

The PAKMAN trial was an adaptive, pragmatic, international, multicenter, randomized controlled superiority trial conducted from June 2015 to October 2017. Three to five years after index surgery a long-term follow-up was performed from October 2020 to April 2021.

RESULTS

For long-term follow-up of survival, 109 patients with EDA were compared to 111 patients with PCIA after partial pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). Long-term follow-up of quality of life (QoL) and pain assessment was available for 40 patients with EDA and 45 patients with PCIA (questionnaire response rate: 94%). Survival analysis revealed that EDA, when compared to PCIA, was not associated with improved overall survival (OS, HR, 1.176, 95% HR-CI, 0.809-1.710, P = .397, n = 220). Likewise, recurrence-free survival did not differ between groups (HR, 1.116, 95% HR-CI, 0.817-1.664, P = .397, n = 220). OS subgroup analysis including only patients with malignancies showed no significant difference between EDA and PCIA (HR, 1.369, 95% HR-CI, 0.932-2.011, P = .109, n = 179). Similar long-term effects on QoL and pain severity were observed in both groups (EDA: n = 40, PCIA: n = 45).

CONCLUSIONS

Results from this long-term follow-up of the PAKMAN randomized controlled trial do not support favoring EDA over PCIA in pancreatic surgery. Until further evidence is available, EDA and PCIA should be considered similar regarding long-term survival.

Для цитирования: Klotz Rosa, Ahmed Azaz, Tremmel Anja, Büsch Christopher, Tenckhoff Solveig, Doerr-Harim Colette, Lock Johan F, Brede Elmar-Marc, Köninger Jörg, Schiff Jan-Henrik, Wittel Uwe A, Hötzel Alexander, Keck Tobias, Nau Carla, Amati Anca-Laura, Koch Christian, Diener Markus K, Weigand Markus A, Büchler Markus W, Knebel Phillip, Larmann Jan. Thoracic Epidural Analgesia Is Not Associated With Improved Survival After Pancreatic Surgery: Long-Term Follow-Up of the Randomized Controlled PAKMAN Trial.. Anesthesia and analgesia. 2025. DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000006812.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.