Hospital & community psychiatry · 1993
Personality disorders diagnosed at intake at a public psychiatric facility.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Fabrega H, Ulrich R, Pilkonis P, Mezzich J
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to determine the prevalence of personality disorders among a large population of persons seeking treatment in a public psychiatric facility and to examine the role of personality disorders in the clinical conditions of persons frequenting such facilities.
METHODS: Clinical and demographic data were retrospectively examined for 18,179 adults who visited a walk-in clinic of a public psychiatric facility between 1983 and 1989. Patients who received a diagnosis of personality disorder were compared with those who did not.
RESULTS: A total of 2,344 patients (12.9 percent) were diagnosed as having a personality disorder, a lower prevalence rate than generally found in treatment populations. The most frequent diagnoses were atypical, antisocial, and borderline personality disorders. Compared with other subjects, those with a personality disorder were significantly more likely to be men, to be 35 years old or younger, to have a higher level of social impairment, and to have more symptoms and more severe symptoms.
CONCLUSIONS: The relatively low prevalence rate was attributed in part to underdiagnosis, largely due to the need for making rapid assessments in a public intake setting. The authors conclude that clinicians in such facilities may be likely to diagnose personality disorders when patients with certain axis I disorders such as substance use, affective, and adjustment disorders present with an overall greater level of symptomatology and social impairment.
METHODS: Clinical and demographic data were retrospectively examined for 18,179 adults who visited a walk-in clinic of a public psychiatric facility between 1983 and 1989. Patients who received a diagnosis of personality disorder were compared with those who did not.
RESULTS: A total of 2,344 patients (12.9 percent) were diagnosed as having a personality disorder, a lower prevalence rate than generally found in treatment populations. The most frequent diagnoses were atypical, antisocial, and borderline personality disorders. Compared with other subjects, those with a personality disorder were significantly more likely to be men, to be 35 years old or younger, to have a higher level of social impairment, and to have more symptoms and more severe symptoms.
CONCLUSIONS: The relatively low prevalence rate was attributed in part to underdiagnosis, largely due to the need for making rapid assessments in a public intake setting. The authors conclude that clinicians in such facilities may be likely to diagnose personality disorders when patients with certain axis I disorders such as substance use, affective, and adjustment disorders present with an overall greater level of symptomatology and social impairment.