[Crisis intervention: assessment process and long-term follow-up of patients].

The aim of this work, which was performed in a Crisis Centre in Geneva, Switzerland, was to study the relationship between a patient's long-term follow-up and the range of the patient's difficulties as assessed during screening by a clinician. Out of the 78 patients who were referred to the Centre during a two-month period in 1985, 31 were followed-up during a complete crisis intervention program. All these patients with severe symptoms would have been hospitalized if they had not been transferred to this program. The clinician's opinion of these patients' difficulties was obtained by using a questionnaire containing open-response questions. The data obtained was then subjected to specific content analysis. The patients' clinical state, diagnosis and changes during therapy were also assessed, using various questionnaires. Our results show that there is a negative correlation between the number or range of difficulties attributed and noted by the clinician and the long-term evolution of the patient, especially after two years. This relationship is dependent on the number, not the type of difficulties noted. Thus, although it is not possible to generalize these results, we have shown that it is possible to study parameters involved in the process of a psychotherapeutic-type treatment, using a questionnaire. We have also shown that crisis intervention can be considered as an especially interesting analogue of the early steps of psychotherapy, spread over a longer period. This is an aspect which is rarely studied.