MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.6026/97320630019876

Медицинская библиотека · Bioinformation · 2023

Maxillofacial trauma among Indians.

Kumar Saurabh, Kashyap Sandeep, Singh Saurabh, Sharma Rohit, Singh Yatendra Pratap, Naik Hani Yousuf

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Orofacial injuries constitute the medico-legal cases reported, especially, in cases associated with road traffic accidents, assaults, and violence making it an emerging healthcare problem. Therefore, it is of interest to document data on the maxillofacial trauma and fractures among Indians. 150 subjects within the age of 15 to 60 years with maxillofacial fractures, detailed medical history including demographics, radiographs, medical history, associated injuries, and etiology of fractures were used for this study. Sites for both maxillary and mandibular fractures were noted. The type of intubation (medical insertion procedure) used and post-operative complications were also recorded. Lefort I, II, and III fractures were seen in 4%, 12%, 6% subjects respectively, whereas, ZMC fracture was seen in 66% study subjects. Mandibular fractures were most commonly seen in the para-symphysis region with 30% subjects followed by condylar region with 28.66% subjects. Data shows that maxillofacial trauma has a high incidence in India with RTA (road traffic accidents being the most common reason for the trauma seen in young males with significant concomitant injuries. Most common fracture is seen in mandible region. However, they can be managed well with very few postoperative complications.

Для цитирования: Kumar Saurabh, Kashyap Sandeep, Singh Saurabh, Sharma Rohit, Singh Yatendra Pratap, Naik Hani Yousuf. Maxillofacial trauma among Indians.. Bioinformation. 2023. DOI: 10.6026/97320630019876.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.