Serial Ultrasound Findings After Laser Ablation for Benign Breast Lesions on Long-Term Follow-Up: Implications for Evaluation of Procedural Success.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
The purpose if this study was to describe the follow-up ultrasound (US) findings of percutaneous US-guided laser ablation for small benign breast lesions, and to define the procedural success.
BACKGROUND DATA: There are limited reports on follow-up imaging after laser ablation, because the ablated tumors were generally resected by surgery.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
US-guided laser ablation was performed on 19 benign breast lesions in 10 patients. The median size of the lesions was 7.8 mm (range, 3-11 mm). The lesions were diagnosed as image-pathology concordant benign by US-guided core biopsy. After ablation, we performed follow-up US with an interval of 3-12 months; the median follow-up period was 32 months (range, 30-36 months). We evaluated the morphologic and size changes by using serial follow-up US.
RESULTS
US findings of the 13 cases followed within the first 6 months after ablation showed hypoechoic lesions having inner hyperechogenicity with or without a hypoechoic center. The size of these lesions during this period increased in comparison with the initial lesion size, and then decreased or became stable on serial follow-up US. On the last follow-up US examination, in 14 cases (73.6%), the lesions were invisible, 4 cases (21.1%) showed scar changes, and 1 case (5.3%) showed a hypoechoic remnant lesion.
CONCLUSIONS
US findings within 6 months after laser ablation showed mixed echoic lesions with increased size, followed by gradual decrease in size. Therefore, the success of laser ablation may be evaluated by checking the changes in the lesions by comparing the size of the lesions with the first follow-up US within 6 months and not the original tumor.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.