MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s10840-024-01835-6

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2024

National workflow experience with pulsed field ablation for atrial fibrillation: learning curve, efficiency, and safety.

Bisignani Antonio, Schiavone Marco, Solimene Francesco, Dello Russo Antonio, Filannino Pasquale, Magnocavallo Michele, Tondo Claudio, Schillaci Vincenzo, Casella Michela, Petretta Andrea, Rossi Pietro, Fassini Gaetano, Rossillo Antonio, Maggio Ruggero, Themistoclakis Sakis, Pandozi Claudio, Polselli Marco, Tundo Fabrizio, Arestia Alberto, Compagnucci Paolo, Valente Perrone Annelisa, Malacrida Maurizio, Iacopino Saverio, Bianchi Stefano

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Recent data on pulsed field ablation (PFA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation suggest a progressive reduction in procedural times. Real-world data regarding the relationship between the learning curve of PFA and clinical outcomes are scarce. The objective was to evaluate the PFA learning curve and its impact on acute outcomes.

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing AF ablation with the FARAPULSE™ PFA system were included in a prospective, non-randomized multicenter study. Procedural times were stratified on the operators' learning curve. Comparative analysis of skin-to-skin time was conducted with radiofrequency (RF) and cryoablation (CB) pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) procedures performed by the same operators in the previous year.

RESULTS

Among 752 patients, 35.1% were females, and 66.9% had paroxysmal AF; mean age was 62.2 ± 10 years. A total of 62.5% of procedures were performed by operators with > 20 PFA procedures. Both time to PVI (25.6 ± 10 min vs 16.5 ± 8, p < 0.0001) and fluoroscopy time (19.8 ± 8 min vs 15.9 ± 8 min, p = 0.0045) significantly improved after 10 associated with consistent linear trend towards procedural time reduction (R2 0.92-0.68 across various procedural metrics). Current PFA skin-to-skin time was lower than the historical skin-to-skin one in 217 (62.4%) procedures; it was similar in 112 (32.2%) cases and higher than the historical skin-to-skin one in 19 (5.5%). No major complications were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

In this nationwide multicentric experience, the novel PFA system proved to be fast, safe, and acutely effective in both paroxysmal and persistent AF patients. The learning curve appears to be rapid, as improvements in procedural parameters were observed after only a few procedures.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Advanced TecHnologies For SuccEssful AblatioN of AF in Clinical Practice (ATHENA). URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ Identifier: NCT05617456.

Для цитирования: Bisignani Antonio, Schiavone Marco, Solimene Francesco, Dello Russo Antonio, Filannino Pasquale, Magnocavallo Michele, Tondo Claudio, Schillaci Vincenzo, Casella Michela, Petretta Andrea, Rossi Pietro, Fassini Gaetano, Rossillo Antonio, Maggio Ruggero, Themistoclakis Sakis, Pandozi Claudio, Polselli Marco, Tundo Fabrizio, Arestia Alberto, Compagnucci Paolo, Valente Perrone Annelisa, Malacrida Maurizio, Iacopino Saverio, Bianchi Stefano. National workflow experience with pulsed field ablation for atrial fibrillation: learning curve, efficiency, and safety.. Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing. 2024. DOI: 10.1007/s10840-024-01835-6.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.