MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology · 2016

An Investigator-initiated Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Ingenol Mebutate 0.05% Gel When Used After Cryosurgery in the Treatment of Hypertrophic Actinic Keratosis on Dorsal Hands.

Hashim Peter W, Nia John K, Singer Skylar, Goldenberg Gary

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of ingenol mebutate 0.05% gel after cryosurgery versus cryosurgery alone for the treatment of hypertrophic and nonhypertrophic actinic keratosis on the dorsal hands.

DESIGN

Investigator-blinded split arm study.

SETTING

Academic institution.

PARTICIPANTS

Sixteen subjects with actinic keratoses on dorsal hands.

RESULTS

There was a mean reduction in the number of hypertrophic actinic keratosis lesions adjusted for baseline in ingenol mebutate-treated versus control group of -4.3 versus -2.8, respectively. There was a mean reduction in the number of non-hypertrophic actinic keratosis lesions in the ingenol mebutate-treated versus control group of -3.8 versus -0.3.

CONCLUSION

A statistically significant and clinically meaningful difference in response was demonstrated in favor of ingenol mebutate-treated hands versus controls. No significant increase in local skin responses was noted when applying ingenol mebutate 0.05% gel on the same day as cryosurgery.

TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02251652.

Для цитирования: Hashim Peter W, Nia John K, Singer Skylar, Goldenberg Gary. An Investigator-initiated Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Ingenol Mebutate 0.05% Gel When Used After Cryosurgery in the Treatment of Hypertrophic Actinic Keratosis on Dorsal Hands.. The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology. 2016.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.