Journal of cataract and refractive surgery · 2026
Quantifying glare phenomena in patients with different intraocular lenses using a standard and modified clinical straylight meter.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Naujokaitis Tadas, Rayamajhi Asu, Auffarth Gerd U, van den Berg Thomas J T P, Khoramnia Ramin, Łabuz Grzegorz
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To assess whether differences in straylight can be detected in patients implanted with multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) using a standard and modified clinical straylight measurement.
SETTING: Tertiary care university eye clinic.
DESIGN: Comparative cross-sectional study.
METHODS: Straylight was measured at 7 and 2.5 degrees using the standard and modified C-Quant devices. 2 measurements per eye and angle were obtained. Logarithm of the straylight parameter (s) at both angles and its increase between 7 and 2.5 degrees were compared between study groups.
RESULTS: 38 patients (67 eyes) were included in total: 12 patients (24 eyes) implanted with Tecnis Synergy, 13 patients (25 eyes) with Clareon PanOptix, and 13 patients (18 eyes) with monofocal lenses. The mean (±SD) straylight values at 7 degrees were 0.98 ± 0.16 log(s) with Synergy, 1.03 ± 0.14 log(s) with PanOptix, and 1.05 ± 0.22 log(s) with monofocal controls ( P = .864). At 2.5 degrees, they were 1.55 ± 0.09 log(s) with Synergy, 1.34 ± 0.10 log(s) with PanOptix, and 1.29 ± 0.21 log(s) with monofocal IOLs ( P < .001). The increase in straylight at 2.5 degrees was 0.57 ± 0.13 log(s) for Synergy, 0.31 ± 0.11 log(s) for PanOptix, and 0.25 ± 0.10 log(s) for monofocal controls ( P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Straylight measurements at 2.5 degrees using the modified technique showed higher straylight levels with Synergy when compared with PanOptix and monofocal IOLs, whereas the standard technique did not detect differences between IOLs. Straylight testing at smaller angles emerges as a sensitive measure to identify multifocal designs posing an increased risk of inducing photic phenomena in pseudophakic patients.
SETTING: Tertiary care university eye clinic.
DESIGN: Comparative cross-sectional study.
METHODS: Straylight was measured at 7 and 2.5 degrees using the standard and modified C-Quant devices. 2 measurements per eye and angle were obtained. Logarithm of the straylight parameter (s) at both angles and its increase between 7 and 2.5 degrees were compared between study groups.
RESULTS: 38 patients (67 eyes) were included in total: 12 patients (24 eyes) implanted with Tecnis Synergy, 13 patients (25 eyes) with Clareon PanOptix, and 13 patients (18 eyes) with monofocal lenses. The mean (±SD) straylight values at 7 degrees were 0.98 ± 0.16 log(s) with Synergy, 1.03 ± 0.14 log(s) with PanOptix, and 1.05 ± 0.22 log(s) with monofocal controls ( P = .864). At 2.5 degrees, they were 1.55 ± 0.09 log(s) with Synergy, 1.34 ± 0.10 log(s) with PanOptix, and 1.29 ± 0.21 log(s) with monofocal IOLs ( P < .001). The increase in straylight at 2.5 degrees was 0.57 ± 0.13 log(s) for Synergy, 0.31 ± 0.11 log(s) for PanOptix, and 0.25 ± 0.10 log(s) for monofocal controls ( P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Straylight measurements at 2.5 degrees using the modified technique showed higher straylight levels with Synergy when compared with PanOptix and monofocal IOLs, whereas the standard technique did not detect differences between IOLs. Straylight testing at smaller angles emerges as a sensitive measure to identify multifocal designs posing an increased risk of inducing photic phenomena in pseudophakic patients.