Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026
Psycho Dermatological Dimensions of Body Dysmorphic Disorder: A Comprehensive Review of Diagnostic Criteria, Treatment Options, and Clinical Outcomes in Dermatological and Cosmetic Surgery Settings.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gumma Lohitha, Gumma Bhargavi
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) is a psychiatric condition characterized by excessive preoccupation with perceived appearance flaws that are minimal or unobservable to others. Individuals with BDD frequently present to dermatology and aesthetic surgery settings seeking cosmetic interventions, placing clinicians at risk of suboptimal outcomes, ethical dilemmas, and medicolegal complications.
METHODS: This narrative review synthesizes evidence from psychiatry, dermatology, and aesthetic surgery literature to examine the epidemiology, clinical characteristics, screening, and management of BDD in dermatologic and cosmetic practice. A structured literature search was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, following PRISMA principles.
RESULTS: BDD is substantially more prevalent among individuals seeking dermatologic and aesthetic procedures than in the general population. Cosmetic and surgical interventions rarely improve core BDD symptoms and are associated with persistent dissatisfaction, symptom exacerbation, and increased legal risk. Validated screening tools, structured preprocedural assessment, and early psychiatric referral are critical to safe and ethical practice. Recent regulatory frameworks increasingly mandate psychological screening prior to cosmetic intervention.
CONCLUSION: Effective management of BDD in dermatologic and aesthetic settings requires early identification, standardized screening, and multidisciplinary collaboration. Cosmetic procedures should be avoided when BDD is suspected, with referral to mental health professionals prioritized. Integrating psychiatric screening into routine aesthetic practice improves patient safety, clinical outcomes, and medicolegal protection. No Level Assigned This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
METHODS: This narrative review synthesizes evidence from psychiatry, dermatology, and aesthetic surgery literature to examine the epidemiology, clinical characteristics, screening, and management of BDD in dermatologic and cosmetic practice. A structured literature search was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, following PRISMA principles.
RESULTS: BDD is substantially more prevalent among individuals seeking dermatologic and aesthetic procedures than in the general population. Cosmetic and surgical interventions rarely improve core BDD symptoms and are associated with persistent dissatisfaction, symptom exacerbation, and increased legal risk. Validated screening tools, structured preprocedural assessment, and early psychiatric referral are critical to safe and ethical practice. Recent regulatory frameworks increasingly mandate psychological screening prior to cosmetic intervention.
CONCLUSION: Effective management of BDD in dermatologic and aesthetic settings requires early identification, standardized screening, and multidisciplinary collaboration. Cosmetic procedures should be avoided when BDD is suspected, with referral to mental health professionals prioritized. Integrating psychiatric screening into routine aesthetic practice improves patient safety, clinical outcomes, and medicolegal protection. No Level Assigned This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .