MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00404-017-4463-0

Медицинская библиотека · Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2017

Follow-up after radical vaginal trachelectomy (RVT): patients' problems and physicians' difficulties.

Speiser Dorothee, Malik Shazia, Lanowska Malgorzata, Bartens Anne, Blohmer Jens-Uwe, Mangler Mandy

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: Patients after radical vaginal trachelectomy (RVT) need specific follow-up treatment because their problems differ from those of other gyneco-oncologic patients. Anatomic changes after surgery complicate examinations. Recognition and treatment of these issues require physician's expertise.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

We evaluated the follow-up data of 70 patients who underwent RVT for early cervical cancer between 03/2010 and 12/2013. The follow-up interval in the first 2 years was 3 and 6 months in the following 2 years. We used a tailored protocol to describe the special problems after RVT.

RESULTS

Cervical stenosis was one of the central problems independent of time interval to RVT. Physicians' most significant problem was to locate the exact position of the neo-cervix and thus to receive valid pap smears.

CONCLUSIONS

Follow-up of patients after RVT needs special expertise because the symptoms differ from those after hysterectomy and examinations ensuring oncologic safety require special attention.

Для цитирования: Speiser Dorothee, Malik Shazia, Lanowska Malgorzata, Bartens Anne, Blohmer Jens-Uwe, Mangler Mandy. Follow-up after radical vaginal trachelectomy (RVT): patients' problems and physicians' difficulties.. Archives of gynecology and obstetrics. 2017. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-017-4463-0.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.