MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/md.0000000000020645

Медицинская библиотека · Medicine · 2020

The efficacy of ketamine in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial protocol.

Chen Jing, Hu Wei, Li Shu-Ming, Li Xiao-Lin, Yang Zhan-Min

Протокол клинического исследованияСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Appropriate pain management is essential to improve the postoperative recovery after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). There is a paucity of literature on ketamine for TKA procedures. The aim of this study was to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of ketamine in patients undergoing primary TKA.

METHODS

This study was designed as a prospective, double blind, single center, randomized controlled trial. The participants were randomly assigned to either the ketamine or placebo groups, using a set of random numbers for the allocation sequence. All patients underwent TKA without patella resurfacing under spinal anesthesia. Preoperative workup, surgical technique, and postoperative management were standardized for all the patients. The primary outcome of this noninferiority study is opioid consumption within the first 24 hours following surgery, pain scores, distance ambulated, patient satisfaction, length of hospital stay, and complications.

RESULTS

The results of this study were expected to provide useful information on the effectiveness and safety of ketamine for immediate postoperative analgesia after TKA surgery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study protocol was registered in Research Registry (researchregistry5575).

Для цитирования: Chen Jing, Hu Wei, Li Shu-Ming, Li Xiao-Lin, Yang Zhan-Min. The efficacy of ketamine in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial protocol.. Medicine. 2020. DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000020645.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.