MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc · 1996

Clinical assessment of Holo-Or trifocal diffractive contact lens.

Fulga V, Schroder S, Avraham G, Belkin M

Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To evaluate the objective and subjective performance of the Holo-Or multifocal contact lens, a new rigid gas permeable (RGP) trifocal diffractive contact lens.

METHODS

Eleven experienced and two non-experienced RGP contact lens wearers participated in the study. Eleven patients were presbyopic (age range: 40-57 years) and two were aphakic (ages: 12 and 14 years). Each patient was evaluated by comparing best spectacle correction to Holo-Or multifocal contact lens correction, using the following tests of visual function: visual acuity at 6 m, 80 cm, and 40 cm; contrast sensitivity at near and distance; and depth of focus.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found between best spectacle correction and the Holo-Or contact lenses. When using the contact lenses, there was an improvement in depth of focus and a small reduction in contrast sensitivity compared with best spectacle correction. Overall satisfaction and comfort was good to excellent in ten of thirteen patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Holo-Or trifocal diffractive contact lenses are a satisfactory means of optical correction for patients with presbyopia or accommodative problems.

Для цитирования: Fulga V, Schroder S, Avraham G, Belkin M. Clinical assessment of Holo-Or trifocal diffractive contact lens.. The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc. 1996.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.