MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/10547738241231626

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical nursing research · 2024

Exploring the Interrelationships Between Physical Function, Functional Exercise Capacity, and Exercise Self-Efficacy in Persons Living with HIV.

Nokes Kathleen M, Sokhela Dudu G, Orton Penelope M, Samuels William Ellery, Phillips J Craig, Tufts Kimberly Adams, Perazzo Joseph D, Chaiphibalsarisdi Puangtip, Portillo Carmen, Schnall Rebecca, Hamilton Mary Jane, Dawson-Rose Carol, Webel Allison R

СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To determine if there were differences between the subjective and objective assessments of physical activity while controlling for sociodemographic, anthropometric, and clinical characteristics.

SETTING/SAMPLE: A total of 810 participants across eight sites located in three countries.

MEASURES: Subjective instruments were the two subscales of Self-efficacy for Exercise Behaviors Scale: Making Time for Exercise and Resisting Relapse and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System, which measured physical function. The objective measure of functional exercise capacity was the 6-minute Walk Test.

ANALYSIS: Both univariate and multivariant analyses were used.

RESULTS

Physical function was significantly associated with Making Time for Exercise (β = 1.76, p = .039) but not with Resisting Relapse (β = 1.16, p = .168). Age (β = -1.88, p = .001), being employed (β = 16.19, p < .001) and race (βs = 13.84-31.98, p < .001), hip-waist ratio (β = -2.18, p < .001), and comorbidities (β = 7.31, p < .001) were significant predictors of physical functioning. The model predicting physical function accounted for a large amount of variance (adjusted R2 = .938). The patterns of results predicting functional exercise capacity were similar. Making Time for Exercise self-efficacy scores significantly predicted functional exercise capacity (β = 0.14, p = .029), and Resisting Relapse scores again did not (β = -0.10, p = .120). Among the covariates, age (β = -0.16, p < .001), gender (β = -0.43, p < .001), education (β = 0.08, p = .026), and hip-waist ratio (β = 0.09, p = .034) were significant. This model did not account for much of the overall variance in the data (adjusted R2 = .081). We found a modest significant relationship between physical function and functional exercise capacity (r = 0.27).

CONCLUSIONS

Making Time for Exercise Self-efficacy was more significant than Resisting Relapse for both physical function and functional exercise capacity. Interventions to promote achievement of physical activity need to use multiple measurement strategies.

Для цитирования: Nokes Kathleen M, Sokhela Dudu G, Orton Penelope M, Samuels William Ellery, Phillips J Craig, Tufts Kimberly Adams, Perazzo Joseph D, Chaiphibalsarisdi Puangtip, Portillo Carmen, Schnall Rebecca, Hamilton Mary Jane, Dawson-Rose Carol, Webel Allison R. Exploring the Interrelationships Between Physical Function, Functional Exercise Capacity, and Exercise Self-Efficacy in Persons Living with HIV.. Clinical nursing research. 2024. DOI: 10.1177/10547738241231626.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.