MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1258/td.2008.080369

Медицинская библиотека · Tropical doctor · 2009

Severe adverse reactions to meglumine antimoniate in the treatment of visceral leishmaniasis: a report of 13 cases in the southwestern region of Brazil.

Oliveira Ana Lúcia Lyrio de, Brustoloni Yvone Maia, Fernandes Thiago Dias, Dorval Maria Elizabeth Cavalheiros, Cunha Rivaldo Venâncio da, Bóia Márcio Neves

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Antimony-based medications continue to be the chosen drug for visceral leishmaniasis treatment in most countries. Pentavalent antimony compounds are highly effective but frequently have adverse reactions. Although toxic effects are almost always reversible, some of them can be severe. Clinical and laboratory data of 13 patients who developed severe adverse reactions to meglumine antimoniate in a teaching hospital in southwestern Brazil in 2004-2005 were analysed. Most patients were adults (10/13), mainly at the age of 50 or older (4/13). The main severe adverse reactions were renal failure (eight episodes), pancreatitis (six episodes) and hepatic failure/hepatitis (five episodes). Six patients died in the period; all presented acute renal failure and four presented hepatic failure. Meglumine antimoniate can cause severe reactions, which can lead to death if not promptly identified. Further studies are warrented on the effect of less toxic drugs.

Для цитирования: Oliveira Ana Lúcia Lyrio de, Brustoloni Yvone Maia, Fernandes Thiago Dias, Dorval Maria Elizabeth Cavalheiros, Cunha Rivaldo Venâncio da, Bóia Márcio Neves. Severe adverse reactions to meglumine antimoniate in the treatment of visceral leishmaniasis: a report of 13 cases in the southwestern region of Brazil.. Tropical doctor. 2009. DOI: 10.1258/td.2008.080369.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.