Child abuse & neglect · 2026
Resilience profiles of children previously exposed to parental gender-based violence: A longitudinal decision tree analysis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yates Julia, Uwizeye Glorieuse, Wathen C Nadine, Mantler Tara
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Children exposed to parental violence (CEPV) may experience a range of adverse outcomes compared to non-exposed peers yet may demonstrate resilience shaped by both internal and external protective factors.
OBJECTIVE: To longitudinally explore the profiles of protective factors in children across the continuum of resilience (i.e., low, moderate, high, and exceptional).
PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: Parent-reported data were collected on behalf of 211 CEPV (Mage = 10.11, SD = 2.21) residing across Canada.
METHODS: Grounded in Resiliency Theory, this longitudinal study used online surveys administered at three timepoints to assess children's resilience and protective factors.
RESULTS: Decision tree modelling at baseline found that children with exceptional resilience were more likely to have better health (χ2 = 56.23, p < 0.001), with whole-family support further bolstering resilience (χ2 = 20.66, p < 0.001; χ2 = 21.76, p < 0.001). At T2, exceptional resilience was associated with perceiving child welfare services as supportive (χ2 = 76.55, p < 0.001), with additional benefits from economic support (χ2 = 35.08, p < 0.001). At T3, high resilience was linked to perceived supportiveness of therapy services (χ2 = 122.91, p < 0.001), further strengthened by caregiver perceptions of women's shelter support (χ2 = 25.55, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that supporting CEPV resilience requires attention to individual assets, safety and stability needs, and access to supportive services addressing violence exposure. This underscores the necessity of trauma- and violence-informed, integrated approaches that extend beyond individual- and family-level factors.
OBJECTIVE: To longitudinally explore the profiles of protective factors in children across the continuum of resilience (i.e., low, moderate, high, and exceptional).
PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: Parent-reported data were collected on behalf of 211 CEPV (Mage = 10.11, SD = 2.21) residing across Canada.
METHODS: Grounded in Resiliency Theory, this longitudinal study used online surveys administered at three timepoints to assess children's resilience and protective factors.
RESULTS: Decision tree modelling at baseline found that children with exceptional resilience were more likely to have better health (χ2 = 56.23, p < 0.001), with whole-family support further bolstering resilience (χ2 = 20.66, p < 0.001; χ2 = 21.76, p < 0.001). At T2, exceptional resilience was associated with perceiving child welfare services as supportive (χ2 = 76.55, p < 0.001), with additional benefits from economic support (χ2 = 35.08, p < 0.001). At T3, high resilience was linked to perceived supportiveness of therapy services (χ2 = 122.91, p < 0.001), further strengthened by caregiver perceptions of women's shelter support (χ2 = 25.55, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that supporting CEPV resilience requires attention to individual assets, safety and stability needs, and access to supportive services addressing violence exposure. This underscores the necessity of trauma- and violence-informed, integrated approaches that extend beyond individual- and family-level factors.