Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2026
Accurate m6A modification forcefield for conformation sampling of RNA.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sun Yutong, Li Zhengxin, Zhong Bozitao, Zhu Junjie, Chen Hai-Feng
Аннотация
N 6-Methyladenosine (m6A) is a prevalent RNA modification that regulates RNA structure, metabolism, and molecular recognition. Atomistic interpretation of these effects requires force fields that describe the context-dependent balance between paired and unpaired m6A. Here, we developed MODM6A, a localized m6A-U interaction correction derived from rigid interaction-energy scans in which both the quantum-mechanical (QM) and molecular-mechanical (MM) reference energies included implicit aqueous solvation. The implicit-water QM profile had a minimum of -9.58 kcal mol-1 at 0.190 nm, whereas the reference AMBER model gave -4.29 kcal mol-1 at 0.195 nm; MODM6A reproduced the target with a minimum of -9.84 kcal mol-1 at 0.185 nm. In 3 µs explicit-solvent simulations, MODM6A increased the mean U10-m6A22 occupancy in MALAT1 from 50.5 ± 12.0% to 81.8 ± 2.5% and the m6A6-U17 occupancy in a DRACH-containing hairpin from 71.3 ± 37.3% to 94.4 ± 2.4% (mean ± SD across three replicates). A matched analysis of the first 1 µs of each trajectory gave target-pair occupancies of 58.4 ± 9.2%, 77.1 ± 8.1%, and 84.4 ± 8.4% in MALAT1 and 82.2 ± 18.4%, 94.1 ± 1.9%, and 94.5 ± 7.2% in the DRACH hairpin for the reference AMBER model, MODM6A, and the Piomponi fit_A parameters, respectively. MODM6A thus achieved pairing behavior comparable to fit_A through a more localized modification that leaves the modrna08 charges and torsional terms unchanged. Global RMSD, radius of gyration, clustering, and tICA nevertheless retained substantial heterogeneity, so the improvement is interpreted as better agreement with experimentally supported local structural preferences rather than conformational locking.